xml:space="preserve">
xml:space="preserve">
Advertisement
Advertisement

'Maryland, My Maryland'? Maybe not. Senate bill aims to strip state song of 'official' status

A bill that received preliminary approval in the state Senate would designate "Maryland, My Maryland" as the "historic" state song.

A bill that advanced Wednesday in the state Senate would not consign ā€œMaryland, My Marylandā€ to the playlist of history but it does seek to relegate the official state song to B-side status.

Senators narrowly gave preliminary approval to legislation that would re-designate the pro-Confederate anthem as the ā€œhistoricalā€ state song — putting some distance between modern Maryland and 157-year-old lyrics that refer to Unionists as ā€œNorthern scumā€ and label President Abraham Lincoln a ā€œdespot.ā€

Advertisement

The action came after some Republican senators criticized the move as hollow and mounted a defense of a song many critics see as a racist relic. They say one can separate the inspirational verse from outdated political motivations.

Sen. Cheryl Kagan, the bill’s sponsor, defended the measure as a compromise crafted by the Senate Education, Health and Environmental Affairs Committee, which has the unenviable task of handling bills dealing with state symbols.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Maryland's pro-Confederacy state song has been abandoned by the state's flagship university, spurring a renewed debate over its merits.

The Montgomery County Democrat’s original bill would have created a selection panel to hold a competition for a replacement for ā€œMaryland, My Maryland,ā€ penned by Southern sympathizer James Ryder Randall in 1861. He wrote the song after what is known as Baltimore’s Pratt Street Riot brought the first bloodshed of the Civil War as rebel sympathizers attacked Union soldiers bound for Washington.

The song, set to the tune of ā€œO Tannenbaum,ā€ exhorts Marylanders to take up the Southern cause and ā€œavenge the patriotic gore that flecked the streets of Baltimore.ā€

Kagan’s bill was one of three proposed in the Senate to scrap all or some of the 1861 lyrics, which the General Assembly adopted as official in 1939 — the year the film ā€œGone With the Windā€ was released and romanticization of the Old South was at its peak. Two measures that proposed altered lyrics set to the same tune failed in committee.

Kagan’s bill survived, but only after it was limited to demoting the song from ā€œofficialā€ to ā€œhistorical.ā€

Advertisement

Senate Minority Leader J. B. Jennings derided the measure as ā€œa participation trophy billā€ and a ā€œwaste of time.ā€

Jennings, who represents Baltimore and Harford counties, noted the recent trend of dismantling Confederate statues and warned that the state flag could be next on the list for abolition.

ā€œWhere does it end?ā€ the Republican said.

What would the choir sing at the Preakness? Jennings asked.

Whatever they want, Kagan answered. She pointed out the bill doesn’t ban the song and that the race’s organizers can decide what is sung.

Sen. Robert G. Cassilly mounted a more affirmative defense of the lyrics. While the Harford County Republican distanced himself from the song’s pro-Confederate sympathies, he likened the reclassification of the song to ā€œbook-burningā€ and praised its poetic homage to Maryland’s military glories.

ā€œIt’s still a very valid call to arms and a motivational song,ā€ he said.

Kagan disagreed.

ā€œOthers of us would see it as divisive, dated and racist,ā€ she said. ā€œIt should not be celebrated any more.ā€

Senators voted down a motion to kill the bill 25-19. Jennings’ amendment to erase the bill’s preamble, which says the song’s words are ā€œcontroversial, inappropriate, and do not represent the ideals and values of Marylanders today,ā€ lost 25-21.

Despite the close vote in preliminary tests, Kagan expressed confidence the bill would prevail on its final vote.

ā€œWe had the votes on the amendment. We’ll have the votes on the floor for final passage,ā€ she said.

The measure’s prospects in the House are uncertain. No comparable measure has been introduced in that chamber. Kagan said she has not yet discussed her bill with House members.

ā€œI think there’s consensus — at least among Democratic legislators — that it’s time,ā€ she said.

Recommended on Baltimore Sun

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement