Pruitt, who retains President Trump’s support, faces several allegations of ethical misconduct.

Regarding U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations and bringing secret science to an end, Administrator Scott Pruitt has stated that regulators must utilize only factual data. That certainly seems sensible to me ("Scott Pruitt's 'transparent' attack on science at the EPA," April 24).

Some members of Congress have been very critical of the EPA for creating regulations based on entirely unproven data resulting in enormous costs to industry and taxpayers. The most common examples often referenced are the air quality regulations based upon a 30-year-old Harvard University study that still remains sealed from public view. It is generally believed that this study has had an enormous impact on our society, but remains closed and unavailable even to Congress through the courts.

Advertisement

This type of regulatory change on the part of EPA Administrator Pruitt seems a good move in my opinion. Your editorial is on soft ground.

David A. Kraus, Nottingham

Send letters to the editor to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement