The problem with jailhouse informants is that they are not motivated to tell the truth (“When innocent people go to prison, jailhouse informants are often to blame. Some Maryland lawmakers want to change the system,” Feb. 13). They are motivated to say whatever the prosecutor wants them to say, and there are no negative consequences for perjuring themselves to help prosecute someone. Not even a slim chance of negative consequences.
The problem with a proposed law that would address this is that it doesn’t go far enough. Identifying a jailhouse informant as being unreliable can take years until some of their falsely accused victims are exonerated. In a situation where a witness is highly motivated to lie and not at all motivated to tell the truth, the only reasonable thing to do is to disallow any jailhouse informant testimony that is not supported by a recording of the supposed confession.
Henry Farkas, Pikesville
Add your voice: Respond to this piece or other Sun content by submitting your own letter.