xml:space="preserve">
Advertisement

Ferries could prove worse for Chesapeake Bay than a new bridge

Westbound traffic crosses the Chesapeake Bay Bridge at sunrise. File. (Jerry Jackson / Baltimore Sun Media Group)

Dan Rodricks’ alternative to Gov. Larry Hogan’s expensive idea for another bridge across the Chesapeake Bay is not the environmental juggernaut he touts (“With electric ferries, Maryland won’t need a third bay bridge,” March 8). In fact, Governor Hogan’s plan may result in a healthier bay than Mr. Rodricks’ push for multitudes of electric ferries crisscrossing at multiple departure and arrival points up and down the estuary.

How does Mr. Rodricks’ proposal not open up vast new areas of pristine farmland and open space to exurban sprawl? Does he doubt that more restaurants, shops and big box stores will spread out haphazardly to these ferries at the many diverse docking spots he advocates? A single new bridge, either at the existing Sandy Point crossing or farther down the shoreline, would create the kind of planned and concentrated development which might allow the Eastern Shore and Southern Maryland to remain largely rural and pristine.

Advertisement

C. Greg Carroll, N. Springfield, Va.

Advertisement
YOU'VE REACHED YOUR FREE ARTICLE LIMIT

Don't miss our 4th of July sale!
Save big on local news.

SALE ENDS SOON

Unlimited Digital Access

$1 FOR 12 WEEKS

No commitment, cancel anytime

See what's included

Access includes: