Worse, there is only one woman on the entire board, and not one woman is an executive officer. What man of moral merit or social integrity, an IQ greater than a prokaryote, or a scintilla of political consciousness would yield his name to a proxy, much less a board, on which there was such a poor gender ratio? What manager of a mutual fund or pension fund or bank or trust or foundation or school or church would perpetuate this social horror by voting for these chauvinists either? None of the guys in this citadel of gynephobia got my vote. Each one of them flunks the most elemental of moral test, the test of fairness. The whole board is complicit in presenting this international insult to the printed proxy. This company needs help.