I was encouraged by the first part of your editorial criticizing Hillary Clinton for the "ethical entanglements" she created for the State Department and the Clinton Foundation ("Clinton's foundational problem," Aug. 24).
The "great left-wing conspiracy," of which The Sun is a charter member, is finally beginning to realize that Ms. Clinton is just as ill-suited to be president as is Donald Trump.
But true to form, and straight from the Clinton playbook, you couldn't just write about her. You needed to explain that no matter how bad a choice she would be, Mr. Trump would be even worse. If you can't explain your candidate's behavior you attack her opponent's behavior.
And why not? That strategy has worked well for the last 25 years.
Randy Respess, Ellicott City