A recent Sun article detailing the fundraising efforts of potential Maryland 2014 gubernatorial candidates left the impression that money alone determines the seriousness and viability of a candidate ("Potential gubernatorial hopefuls start 2014 fundraising early," Nov. 13).
The sad truth is that too often money determines more than just one's seriousness. According to one report, nationwide the best-funded candidates won 80 percent of the time in 2010.
As for debates, the candidates with the most money can stand on the podium looking down on those who raised lesser amounts.
So what's the point of even voting? Why not just save the time and expense and declare whoever has the most money on Election Day the winner?
But when you look at our dysfunctional Congress and its single-digit approval ratings, you have to ask, "How's that been working for ya?"
We believe that running for public office is truly a noble cause, and that the majority of those who run do so with the full intention of making a positive difference in their community.
It is imperative, especially at the local level, that we start getting the best people elected, not just the best funded.
Herbert Sweren and Barry Silverman