Does the general public really oppose taxes on billboards that use publicly funded highways for free to advertise to drivers in cars that run on gas that is taxed ("Clear Channel sues Baltimore, calls new billboard tax 'unconstitutional,'" Aug. 16)?
I doubt that few beyond the well-heeled Outdoor Advertising Association really worry about a tax on Clear Chanel's billboards.
Claims of the generosity of Clear Chanel by giving free billboards are like the admitting of foxes in the hen house.
How much more important is it for Baltimore City's budget to be a little enhanced to help reduce crime, rats, litter and clutter, than it is for billboards to remain tax free?
Ellen H. Kelly, Baltimore