The Harford County Farm Fair continued Wednesday afternoon under less rainy conditions.
Some might not think of it this way, but farmland is critical infrastructure akin to roads and bridges. It is the source of the food that sustains us. In addition, farmland provides open space, areas for recreation and habitat for wildlife. It controls floods, suppresses fires, filters water and represents a vast carbon sink to mitigate — and even help reverse — climate change. Think Maryland’s Eastern Shore.
As Americans blessed with a remarkably productive agricultural landscape we need to take a holistic vision of the future, one that acknowledges farmland as irreplaceable infrastructure we cannot afford to lose, supports environmentally sound farming practices and views farmers as the stewards of that land, worthy of our fervent support — because, at heart, what these farmers do is for all of us.
That’s why we are asking the Maryland Department of Transportation to consider farmland among the impacts in the Chesapeake Bay Crossing Study.
Farmland contributes a trillion dollars a year to the U.S. economy — over $8.25 billion from Maryland’s agricultural land, and $3 billion of value add. Farming is a critical economic engine for the shore. Queen Anne’s County alone boasts the most farmland acres and the largest farming economy in the state of Maryland. Kent County has the largest percentage of land devoted to agriculture of all counties in Maryland at 76 percent. Talbot and Caroline counties are similarly reliant on farming and farmland.
Importantly, well-managed farmland is a one-of-a-kind-tool in the fight against climate change and can help Maryland meet its 2020 goal to reduce greenhouse gasses (GHGs) by 34.66 million tons. According to the 2017 annual report of the Maryland Commission on Climate Change “land conservation and sustainable management offers an important mechanism for mitigating and adapting to climate change [helping] to avoid or diminish additional GHG emissions which would be associated with development.
In May, American Farmland Trust (AFT) released the most comprehensive assessment ever undertaken on the loss of U.S. farmland: Farms Under Threat: The State of America’s Farmland. It found that between 1992 and 2012, almost 31 million acres of farmland were lost – that’s 175 acres per hour no longer available to produce food, fuel and fiber. Other key findings include:
Nearly twice the area of farmland was lost than was previously shown;
Development disproportionately occurred on agricultural lands, with 62 percent of all development occurring on farmland;
Expanding urban areas accounted for 59 percent of the loss. Low-density residential development, or the building of houses on 1 to 20-acre parcels, accounted for 41 percent.
A subsequent report will analyze state-level data on past farmland conversion and the effectiveness of state-level farmland protection policies including a state policy score card.
“Farms Under Threat” identified that only 17 percent or so of all the land in the continental United States is suited for intensive food and crop production. Maryland’s Eastern Shore is blessed with a high percentage of prime farmland and must be protected — as high as 77 percent for counties like Kent and 55 percent for Queen Anne’s county.
And while establishing a new bridge corridor or expanding the current one followed by the expansion of necessary highways may be the most obvious approach to addressing traffic congestion, there is growing consensus that this approach is ineffective.
Alternative solutions to traffic congestion have been proposed and should be considered — a regional transportation authority and system, managed demand strategies, and land use policies that promote compact growth and walkable communities to name just a few. These alternatives are in line with the Maryland Commission on Climate Change’s recommendations, which emphasize the need to avoid or reduce future growth in vulnerable coastal areas (like the Chesapeake Bay region).
In AFT’s analyses, development has been shown to follow highways and thus is a significant driver of farmland conversion. Development has unintended and often unobserved consequences on farming. It uproots farmers, pushes food production to more marginal lands and hampers the ability of remaining farmers to do what they do productively.
We need to save the land that sustains us. No farms? No food, no future.
Environmentalists are slamming a new draft Chesapeake Bay restoration agreement for failing to address toxic pollution or even mention climate change as a complicating factor in the three-decade effort to revive the ailing estuary.