Transgender people have been able to openly serve in the military since 2016. (July 26, 2017)

July 26 is a significant day in American military history.

Sixty-nine years ago, on July 26, 1948, President Harry Truman signed an executive order abolishing racial segregation in the Armed Forces allowing African-Americans to serve in all branches of the military.

Advertisement

Fast-forward. July 26, 2017 will go down in military history for a different reason. On that day, President Donald Trump brought discrimination back to the Armed Forces by banning all transgender troops from military service.

In an early morning series of tweets that blindsided members of Congress, White House staffers, and the secretary of defense, Mr. Trump declared that, effective immediately, transgender Americans would not be allowed to serve "in any capacity in the U.S. military." Why? Because, Mr. Trump argued, the military "cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail."

Note the key word: "disruption." Sound familiar? It should. Because it's the exact term previously used to deny blacks, women and gays the right to serve in the military. It was phony then, and it's phony now: nothing but the same, old, lame excuse for discrimination, just with a different face.

Truman shot down that argument in relation to African-Americans. But in the 1990's it was back, aimed against women by men who argued either that women didn't belong in the military at all because they'd be too big of a distraction for male soldiers, or that they should not be allowed in combat because, as then-Speaker Newt Gingrich explained: "Females have biological problems staying in a ditch for 30 days because they get infections, and they don't have upper-body strength."

Ironically, President Bill Clinton resolved the women-in-combat issue, only to fall for the phony argument that gays shouldn't be allowed to serve openly in the military, either. Having gay and straight soldiers serve side by side meant "the introduction of sexual attraction," one general warned Congress, and "could lead to combat deaths."

Obama ends gays in military ban

President Barack Obama on Friday formally enacted the end to the ban on gays serving openly in the military.

It took President Obama to end "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and to roll out the welcome mat for transgender Americans — a policy now reversed, less than a year later, by Donald Trump, who would not allow them to serve "in any capacity:" not in combat; not even as chefs, clerks, mechanics, engineers, truck drivers, intelligence officers, or any other vital job in the military.

No matter how you look at it, Donald Trump's hissy fit has no basis in fact. Take the numbers. In 1948, writes the New York Times, "there were about 62,000 black soldiers in the Army ... about a tenth of the total." Today, "there are between 1,000 and 7,000 transgender service members on active duty, of 1.3 million in total." That's hardly enough to undermine military readiness.

Most important, those transgender soldiers are serving our country with valor and distinction around the globe, in Iraq and Afghanistan, in combat and support missions. What happens to those brave transgender people now in uniform? Do they stay or will they be tossed out of the military? The White House says they have no idea. They haven't figured that out yet. We should not be chasing transgender men and women out of the military, we should be thanking them for their service — as, in fact, 18 other countries do, including the UK, Australia, France, Germany, and Israel.

Transgender corpsman part of new military frontier

Camp Pendleton Navy corpsman willl soon serve as woman

As for the "tremendous medical costs" involved, that's a phony argument, too. As Politico first reported, that's what triggered the surprise Trump tweet. Conservative House Republicans initially tried to amend the defense appropriations bill by blocking the military from paying for surgery or hormone therapy for transgender soldiers. Based on a 2016 Rand Corp. study that found trans-related medical care only amounts to $2.4 to $8.4 million, or 0.004 to 0.17 percent of the overall $49.3 billion Pentagon health care budget, 24 Republicans joined 190 Democrats in voting against that amendment.

Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows then warned the White House that, without this provision, conservatives would kill the entire defense bill, which — guess what? — includes money for Donald Trump's pet project, the border wall. Whereupon, in order to save his sacred wall, Mr. Trump decided to throw transgender Americans under the bus: not only by refusing to pay their health care, which is all conservatives wanted, but by banning them from the military altogether.

President Trump just used the U.S. military as a pawn

Never have we seen a president provoke such chaos in the military, acting with no regard for the welfare of the troops or the security of the nation.

And, of course, he did so in the middle of what the White House was calling "American Heroes Week." Only Donald Trump would honor heroes by firing them. Sad!

Bill Press is host of a nationally-syndicated radio show, CNN political analyst and the author of a new book, "Buyer's Remorse."You can hear "The Bill Press Show" at his website: billpressshow.com. His email address is: bill@billpress.com; Twitter: @bpshow.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement