The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists advanced the symbolic Doomsday Clock a notch closer to the end of humanity Thursday, moving it ahead by 30 seconds. It is now set at two minutes to "midnight."
It's getting closer to midnight and the horrific possibility of nuclear war. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists just moved the Doomsday Clock forward 30 seconds to 11:58 — two minutes to the dreaded witching hour.The North Korean nuclear standoff and the lack of global progress toward disarmament has increased the alarm. President Donald Trump has not helped either, with his reckless tweets and threats to "totally destroy North Korea."
Beatrice Fihn of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) warns, "The actions and policies of the nuclear-armed states are winding the Doomsday Clock towards midnight. We have been lucky to avoid conflict through intentional or accidental means, but recent posturing and the false alarms in Hawaii and Japan show our luck is about to run out if we don’t move quickly."
The Doomsday Clock first appeared on the cover of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists magazine in 1947. It was a warning to the public that nuclear catastrophe could be near. The clock is meant to spur action to control the threat of nuclear weapons. The Bulletin's recent action put the Doomsday Clock at the closest it’s been to to midnight since 1953 when the United States and Soviet Union tested hydrogen bombs. President Dwight Eisenhower sought nuclear arms control with his Atoms for Peace proposal late that year.
Who in the United States has the power to decide when to wage war? It is reserved for "We the People,' a professor of constitutional law writes.
By Michael E. Lozano
Jan 24, 2018 | 4:15 PM
As Eisenhower said in his 1958 State of the Union, "The world cannot afford to stand still on disarmament. We must never give up the search for a basis of agreement." President Trump, on the other hand, has made little effort toward nuclear diplomacy. This is tragic because U.S. leadership is desperately needed.
Instead of sending out mindless threats to the Soviets, Eisenhower tried to achieve a treaty with them on ending nuclear weapons testing. This effort led to a suspension of nuclear tests on both sides during the last three years of his presidency.
It also paved the way for the Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty signed by President John F. Kennedy in 1963, which reduced tensions in the wake of the Cuban Missile Crisis. The Limited Test Ban Treaty set the Doomsday Clock back to 12 minutes to midnight, but the hope was that a more comprehensive treaty would follow. But to this day we have still not achieved a complete ban on nuclear testing.
Donald Trump's rhetoric raises the possibility that miscalculation, if not madness, may plunge us into Armageddon, says Jules Witcover.
By Jules Witcover
Jan 19, 2018 | 2:55 PM
We should get this treaty ready now as a step toward defusing tensions with North Korea. The United States should lead in getting the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) to take effect worldwide. This treaty bans all nuclear test explosions. There are currently eight holdout nations: The United States, China, North Korea, Iran, Egypt, Israel, India and Pakistan. If the United States, North Korea and China (the North's ally) ratified the CTBT together this would stop nuclear tests and build cooperation toward disarmament. The three nations could participate in on-site inspection exercises for the CTBT, which would enhance confidence for more agreements. The CTBT can also help jump start disarmament negotiations among all the nuclear states. There is even a large CTBT Youth Group of students from around the globe advocating for the treaty's passage. President Trump should announce plans to ratify the CTBT during his State of the Union address.
It is very much in our interests to have a world free of nuclear weapons especially when the threats of terrorist theft and accidental launch are very real. In fact, these were two of the primary reasons cited by General Andrew Goodpaster and General Lee Butler in 1996 when they put forward a long term plan for nuclear arms elimination. Those dangers are even more prominent today.
The recent false alarm of a missile headed toward Hawaii is also a terrifying reminder that simple mistakes could lead to a nuclear war.
As Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard said, "What makes me particularly angry is that the people of Hawaii and this country live with the fear of a missile attack at all." Ms. Gabbard says we need to negotiate with North Korea to end the risk of nuclear attack. She is right.