Advertisement

Inauguration Day: a uniquely American spectacle

On Friday, tens of millions of people will watch the pomp and spectacle of a uniquely American tradition. The gleaming marching band on parade, the holy men and women delivering solemn invocations, the politicos in tuxes and gowns dancing their way through evening balls. And, of course, the next president of the United States of America, right hand up, left hand on the Bible, being sworn in for the highest office of the most powerful nation on the planet.

Yet all of the day's formalities fail to cover up certain strains that often accompany this public ceremony. For alongside the pageantry, our inaugurations also expose some of the biggest tensions that define the U.S. presidency — and show how our democracy has survived to repeat the ritual for the nation's 45th commander-in-chief.

Advertisement

First and foremost, presidential inaugurations are, of course, markers of peaceful transitions of power — a method of handover that's been more exception than the rule in the course of human history. They're also celebrations for an elected office that is particularly American.

At the founding of the republic, monarchs led nearly every other nation. Even as democratic systems began to spread, most countries adopted parliamentary systems where legislatures chose prime ministers to head their governments (often alongside a ceremonial head of state). But the U.S. presidency falls somewhere in between, with a government leader who assumes office on behalf of a political party, yet is expected to be a unifying head of state for all Americans.

As our first elected president, George Washington was conscious that he was setting precedent for this new position as head of a republic. He had already resigned his command of the Continental Army a few years earlier, despite calls for him to keep his wartime powers and rule the nation as a dictator or king. Yet he and his supporters also saw how his vast prestige could help support a fragile new government. So instead of simply administering the oath of office, the only constitutionally-mandated element of an inauguration, they turned Washington's ascension to the presidency into a show — one that helped publicly reconcile the compound, if not contradictory, roles bestowed on America's top post.

The result blended the trappings of European monarchs they thought would give the office legitimacy with heavy nods to the presidency's democratic foundations. In many ways, the inauguration looked like a coronation. Washington's swearing in was turned into spectacle, complete with throngs of adoring lookers-on, invocations of the divine and a gun salute.

But the new president also took care to keep the ceremony from looking too much like a crowning. Washington wore a plain brown suit to the affair, which was held at Federal Hall in the then-capitol of New York. He used his inaugural address (likely written with the help of James Madison) to praise the republican model of government, and to show humility at the task "to which," he said, "the voice of my country called me." And, of course, he drew attention to the president's solemn pledge to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Washington also set another powerful precedent eight years later: After two elected terms, he retired. His refusal to cling to control provided reassurance to those who feared the power of a single executive. It also set the stage for peaceful, regular transitions for centuries to come.

The pageantry continued after Washington. In 1797, Oliver Ellsworth became the first chief justice to administer the oath of office when he swore in John Adams. Thomas Jefferson's first inaugural was also the first to take place in the new capitol of Washington, and his second featured the first parade. James Madison had the first inaugural ball in 1809. And in 1981, Ronald Reagan shifted the ceremony from the Capitol's East Portico to its West Front, allowing more of the public to witness the event from grounds of the National Mall.

But divisiveness can still undermine democracy's big day. Between Abraham Lincoln's election and inauguration in 1861, seven southern states declared their secession from the Union and began forming the Confederate States of America. Rumors spread of plots to prevent Lincoln from reaching the capitol to ascend the presidency, so the president-elect disguised himself and took a night train through pro-slavery Baltimore to reach Washington on time. Artillery companies guarded Capitol Hill, and sharpshooters lined his Pennsylvania Avenue route on Inauguration Day. Despite the drama, Lincoln used his first address to strike a conciliatory tone, telling Southerners, "We are not enemies, but friends." It was all for naught. Within six weeks, the Civil War had begun. But America did have a properly sworn-in president at the helm.

Partisanship also marked Andrew Jackson's inauguration in 1829, which was more victory party than reconciliation. Outgoing President Quincy Adams didn't show. But, fitting the new everyman order, a rowdy crowd of over 10,000 supporters did.

Yet just as many inaugurations are remembered for presidents-elect who tried to smooth bumpy handoffs. In 1801, Thomas Jefferson, who was the first president to come from a different party from that of his predecessor, tried to strike a unifying tone in his inaugural address, declaring, "We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists." And more recently, Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama negotiated what is considered to be the best-managed presidential transition — and did so amid an economic crisis, post-9/11 national security concerns, two ongoing wars and a particularly historic handover.

President Obama is expected to make some sort of symbolic show Friday as well, honoring a tradition that has been interrupted with rare exception (assassination, resignation, natural death and a few 19th century cases of animosity). It's perhaps the ceremony's most powerful, if occasionally awkward, symbol of the peaceful passage of power.

Richard M. Skinner teaches political science at Johns Hopkins and George Washington Universities; he wrote this essay for Zocalo Public Square.

Advertisement
Advertisement