Describing healthy 60-somethings as 'elderly' is not OK [Letter]

Reporter Carrie Wells recently described a woman who was injured in a boat accident as "elderly" ("Woman rescued from fire on boat in Harbor East," May 17).

The woman was described as 68 years old. As a woman who is turning 70 in a few days, I took umbrage at that. I play golf several times a week, go to Zumba, weights and aerobics classes and feel far from "elderly."


I was curious to find out at exactly what age Ms. Wells considers someone to be "elderly?" Possibly a hundred or more years ago, when people did not live as long, a person in their 60s might have been considered "elderly." But I doubt you will find anyone in their 60s or even 70s who would describe themselves that way today.

At a time when people struggle so hard not to use words that could be described as "racist" or "sexist," doesn't The Sun realize that certain words might not be "age-sensitive" and might offend certain readers — especially the very type of people it is describing?


Sadly, all the reporters in my age group who used to work at The Sun have probably left.

Claire Albert, Columbia


To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.