Shame on Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller for his stance on the proposed alcohol tax, stating that it is "nonsense" and "not going to happen" ("Miller says increase to alcohol tax is 'nonsense,'" Jan. 12). Maryland is facing a $1.6 billion deficit with huge cuts looming. Research demonstrates that the alcohol tax is not only a viable measure to increase revenues but also a means to improve public health.

It has been almost 40 years (1972) since the beer and wine excise tax was raised, and 56 years (1955) for spirits. It is estimated that over $215 million would be generated for the general fund through the alcohol excise tax. In addition to the fiscal benefits, research suggests that this tax saves lives, increases productivity, reduces health care costs and prevents alcohol related injuries.

In Maryland, alcohol costs the state over $3.5 billion per year in services including in health care, illness, crime, institutionalization, etc. It is also the leading drug problem among youth and the cause of one-third of deaths for the population aged 15-20. Finally, this tax has overwhelming constituent support, with polling data showing that over 66 percent of Marylanders support the tax.

The money generated from this tax would go to our neighbors who need it the most, funding critical health-related services. With furloughs, layoffs, endangered safety net services and other detrimental cuts occurring in the wake of a $1.6 billion deficit, how could such a tax be "nonsense"? Why is a revenue boosting measure that provides health benefits and prevents budget cuts "not going to happen"?

Perhaps what is nonsensical is that this elected official's family owns and operates one of the largest liquor stores in Maryland.

Margaret Flanagan, Baltimore