Not only are we failing to protect our children from deranged people wielding semi-automatic guns, we're not protecting them from poverty. The rate of child poverty keeps rising -- even faster than the rate of adult poverty. We now have the highest rate of child poverty in the developed world.
And we're not protecting their health. Rates of child diabetes and asthma continue to climb. America has the third-worst rate of infant mortality among 30 industrialized nations and the second-highest rate of teenage pregnancy, after Mexico.
If we go over the "fiscal cliff" without a budget deal, several programs focused on the well-being of children will be axed -- education, child nutrition, school lunches, children's health, Head Start. Even if we avoid the cliff, any "grand bargain" to tame the deficit is likely to jeopardize them.
The Urban Institute projects the share of federal spending on children (outlays and tax expenditures) will drop from 15 percent last year to 12 percent in 2022.
At the same time, states and localities have been slashing preschool and after-school programs, child care, family services, recreation and mental-health services.
Conservatives want to blame parents for not doing their job. But this ignores politics.
The National Rifle Association, for example, is one of the most powerful lobbies in America -- so powerful, in fact, that our leaders rarely have the courage even to utter the words "gun control."
A few come forth after a massacre such as occurred in Connecticut to suggest that maybe we could make it slightly more difficult for the mentally ill to obtain assault weapons. But the gun lobby and gun manufacturers routinely count on America's (and the media's) short attention span to prevent even modest reform.
The AARP is also among the most powerful lobbies, especially when it comes to preserving programs that benefit seniors. We shouldn't have to choose between our seniors and children -- I'd rather focus on jobs and growth rather than on deficit reduction, and sooner cut corporate welfare and defense spending than anything else. But the brute fact is that America's seniors have political clout that matters when spending is being cut, while children don't.
At the same time, big corporations and the wealthy know how to get and keep tax cuts that are starving federal and state budgets of revenues needed to finance what our children need. Corporations systematically play off one state or city against another for tax concessions and subsidies to stay or move elsewhere, further shrinking revenues available for education, recreation, mental health and family services.
Meanwhile, advertisers and marketers of junk foods and violent video games have the political heft to ward off regulations designed to protect children from their depredations. The result is an epidemic of childhood diabetes, as well as video mayhem that may harm young minds.
Most parents can't protect their children from all of this. They have all they can do to pay the bills. The median wage keeps falling (adjusted for inflation), benefits are evaporating, job security has disappeared, and even work hours are less predictable.
It seems as if every major interest has political clout -- except children. They can't vote. They don't make major campaign donations. They can't hire fleets of lobbyists.
Yet they're America's future.
Their parents and grandparents care, of course, as do many other private citizens. But we're no match for the entrenched interests that dominate American politics.
Whether it's fighting for reasonable gun regulation, child health and safety overall, or good schools and family services, we can't have a fair fight as long as special-interest money continues to poison our politics.
Robert Reich, former U.S. Secretary of Labor, is professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley and the author of "Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future." He blogs at www.robertreich.org. Copyright 2012 by Robert Reich; distributed by Tribune Media Services Inc.