xml:space="preserve">
xml:space="preserve">
Advertisement
Advertisement

Two black holes colliding not enough? Make it three. ‘We have seen a visible signal from a previously invisible part of the universe.'

An image provided by the California Institute of Technology shows an artist's concept of a supermassive black hole and its surrounding disk of gas, and two smaller black holes embedded in that disk and orbiting each other.
An image provided by the California Institute of Technology shows an artist's concept of a supermassive black hole and its surrounding disk of gas, and two smaller black holes embedded in that disk and orbiting each other. (R. Hurt/IPAC/Caltech via The New York Times)

In an announcement last week, astronomers described the detection of an epistemological marvel: an invisible collision of invisible objects — black holes — had become briefly visible. The story goes like this:

Long, long ago, about 4 billion years before now and in a faraway galaxy, a pair of black holes collided. Typically such an event would leave no visible trace, just a shuddering of space-time — gravitational waves — and a bigger black hole. (Black holes emit no light.)

Advertisement

But these black holes were part of a swirl of star parts, gas and dust surrounding a third, gigantic black hole, a supermassive black hole 100 million times more massive than the sun. As a result, the merging pair generated a shock wave of heat and light that allowed the collision to be seen as well as heard.

That is the explanation being offered by a group of astronomers, led by Matthew Graham of the California Institute of Technology, for a curious flash of light they recorded last year. Their conclusion, announced Thursday, was laid out in a paper in Physical Review Letters.

Advertisement

If the result holds up, it would mark the first time that colliding black holes have produced light as well as gravitational waves. “We have seen a visible signal from a previously invisible part of the universe,” Graham said.

K.E. Saavik Ford, of the American Museum of Natural History and the City University of New York and an author of the new study, said about the black holes, “It means we can see them and hear them at the same time.” She called the whole event “super exciting.”

The work, the researchers say, could lead to new insights into how, when and where black holes merge into ever bigger monsters that weigh millions or billions of suns and dominate the centers of galaxies. It could also elucidate the conditions inside the crackling turnstile of fire and fury through which matter passes on its way to black-hole doom.

Two black holes colliding while in the whirling grip of another? “Astrophysics probably doesn’t get more exciting than that,” Graham said.

Black holes are objects predicted by Albert Einstein to be so dense that not even light can escape them. Most of the black holes that astronomers know about are the corpses of massive stars that have died and collapsed catastrophically into nothing; the dark remnants are a few times as massive as the sun. But galaxies harbor black holes millions or billions of more massive than that. How black holes can grow so big is an abiding mystery of astronomy.

In 2016, scientists for the first time detected the collision of two distant black holes, using the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory, or LIGO, a pair of L-shape antennas in Hanford, Washington, and Livingston, Louisiana. Since then LIGO and a third antenna, Virgo, in Italy, together have charted dozens of similar catastrophic marriages out there in the dark. But astronomers have yet to see any trace of light from them. (One exception was a collision of neutron stars, the remnants of supernova explosions, that lit up the universe and was detected in August 2017.)

On May 21, 2019, an alert went out to the world’s astronomers that the LIGO and Virgo antennas had recorded what looked like two black holes colliding. Among the telescopes on duty that night was the Zwicky Transient Facility, a robotic instrument on Palomar Mountain in California, which monitors the deep sky for anything that flares, blinks, explodes or moves. It is named after Fritz Zwicky, an innovative and eccentric Swiss astronomer who worked at Caltech.

Graham, the project scientist for the Zwicky telescope, and his colleagues had been mulling the possibility that black hole mergers might be happening in the dense, sparky accretion disks of supermassive black holes, which are the central engines for quasars. The team began monitoring quasars in the those regions for unusual activity.

The trail from the May gravitational wave event led to a quasar known as J124942.3+344929, located about 4 billion light-years from Earth. Examining records from the Zwicky telescope, Graham discovered that the quasar had flared, doubling in brightness for about a month — an uncharacteristically large fluctuation. That marked it as a possible black hole collision, he said.

Bolstering that hypothesis was the fact that the flare did not become visible until 34 days after the gravitational waves had been detected. It would take about that long for any light from a black hole collision to emerge from such a thick disk of gas, according to a model that Ford and Barry McKernan, her colleague at the American Museum of Natural History, described in a paper last year.

Ford described the accretion disk as " a swarm of stars and dead stars, including black holes,” in a Caltech news release.

She added: “These objects swarm like angry bees around the monstrous queen bee at the center. They can briefly find gravitational partners and pair up but usually lose their partners quickly to the mad dance. But in a supermassive black hole’s disk, the flowing gas converts the mosh pit of the swarm to a classical minuet, organizing the black holes so they can pair up.”

Advertisement

The result, she said, can be a frenzy of black holes combining and recombining into bigger and bigger cosmic graves. This, she said, is what might have caused the signal that was detected in May 2019.

That could explain how the black holes in this collision grew so big, she said. The black hole that emerged from this collision and left a fiery trail through the accretion disk was at least 100 times as massive as the sun. But 50 solar masses is the weight limit for black holes formed directly from dead stars, meaning that the two holes that collided in May 2019 were right at the limit and probably even bigger. So they didn’t result directly from a stellar collapse, she said. Rather, they probably formed through a series of ever-larger mergers.

The collision heard by LIGO and Virgo might have been only the end of a chain reaction of black holes mating. “This is the tip of the iceberg,” Ford said.

In the story that Graham and his team patched together, the black holes were spinning, which caused a recoil that shot the merged result almost straight up and eventually out of the accretion disk at 120 miles per second, at which point the flare stopped. If the explanation is accurate, the black hole should fall back into the accretion disk at the same speed in a few months or a year, generating another flare. “We’ll be looking for that,” Graham said.

The supermassive black hole at the center of all this is about 100 million times the mass of the sun. It remained unperturbed by all the fuss around it, but could eventually eat the smaller black hole that set off this flare and everything else nearby, but not anytime soon, astronomers say.

Scientists associated with the LIGO and Virgo arrays have not yet published their own analysis of the collision’s gravitational wave signal. Officially it is still a “candidate” event, and they have declined to comment on Graham’s paper, pending publication of their own.

In the interim, Ford said, her team has an opportunity to predict what the LIGO analysis will show: among other things, that the combined mass of the black holes was 100 solar masses; that the two were spinning rapidly; and even the recoil velocity of the resultant black hole.

Advertisement

“We were trying to beat them,” Ford said. “We wanted to make a prediction. We wanted to put our heads on the chopping block and see where the ax falls.”

Graham added: “Which is great. “It’s a better way of doing science.”

c.2020 The New York Times Company

Recommended on Baltimore Sun

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement