Concealed guns could save lives
What a senseless, preventable and sad tragedy it is that a young, productive man was cut down by a thug on the day of his first child's birth ("Birth, death collide on Mother's Day," May 12).
In Virginia, Carlos Santay might have had a chance to defend himself and to live a productive life with his young wife and child.
In Virginia, honest citizens are allowed to conceal a firearm. Perhaps the thug who ruined so many lives on that fateful day might not have been so bold as to rob and kill Mr. Santay if he had thought he might be packing a weapon.
It is time Maryland allowed its citizens the same right 39 other states do by passing a law that allows people to carry concealed weapons.
This would ensure that Maryland's violent crime statistics would improve, as even thugs don't want to die.
Gary Gamber, Reisterstown
The real threats to our freedom
Signs such as "Caution: Coffee is hot" are admittedly idiotic and, therefore, easy to scorn ("The land of the free gives way to a nation of crushing uniformity," Commentary, May 11). But they aren't much of a threat to anybody's individuality or freedom.
Laws such as the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which violates our 800-year-old habeas corpus rights, and the Orwellian-named Protect America Act, which shreds the Fourth Amendment, are such a threat.
But in their Mr. Magoo-like critique of the state of American freedom, Leonard Pitts Jr. and his interviewee, Anna, completely overlook such grave setbacks to our freedom.
Unfortunately, their gaze has been distracted by litigiousness and political correctness - which is a relative sideshow.
Daniel Fleisher, Baltimore
Loyalty oaths insult our liberty
I read with pride and admiration that Quaker Wendy Gonaver lost her job at California State University, Fullerton for refusing to sign a loyalty oath ("Loyalty oath costs teacher her job," May 7).
As a Quaker, I can say that this Friend's testimony and subsequent economic suffering after her act of conscience are entirely consistent with the many similar expressions of faith by members of the Religious Society of Friends over the past 350 years.
Such Friends are an inspiration to us.
On the other hand, my native state of California and Cal State Fullerton appear rather petty and foolish.
Loyalty oaths serve no useful or legitimate public purpose, except perhaps to later add perjury as a bargaining chip to a list of charges for some real or imagined breach of national security.
Otherwise, they function simply as a mean-spirited attempt to intimidate persons of conscience.
I know this because I refused to sign a similar oath in the Fresno County school system in 1970. I was then alternately bullied and cajoled to sign it because people argued, in the first place, that doing so was a matter of the highest civic duty and, in the second, that I could be sure that no one would pay any attention to the oath after I had signed it.
What pitiful nonsense.
By continuing to demand loyalty oaths from jobholders, Cal State Fullerton will get what it wants - if what it wants is to winnow out employees of liberal conscience and genuine principle.
Then it will certainly get what it deserves.
William O. Miles, Baltimore
Will others fight oath requirement?
Richard C. Paddock's article on a law from the communist-threat era ("Loyalty oath costs teacher her job," May 7) reads like an opinion column, stating as it does that the main effect of the law is "to weed out religious believers, particularly Quakers and Jehovah's Witnesses."
If that assertion is true, it's hard to imagine any court would agree with the claim of Cal State University that the law "did not discriminate against [fired teacher Wendy] Gonaver because all employees are required to sign the oath."
The editorial leeway granted the article's author seems odd, if curiously refreshing.
The fact that the state can enforce a loyalty pledge should remind us how precariously thin the veneer of American freedom can be.
Please follow up and let us know if anyone else will step up to challenge this law.
Robert O'Connell, Baltimore
Police beating just reprehensible
As I watched the video of the police officers beating men who hadn't been convicted of any crime, I felt sick to my stomach ("Police in Phila. investigated in beatings," May 8).
Police officers are trained to use only the force necessary to effect an arrest. But from what I've seen of the video, at no time did the officers attempt to arrest these men; they just beat the hell out of them.
The behavior of these officers is reprehensible. And to those who say we shouldn't rush to judgment, I say, there's no need to rush to judgment - the video speaks for itself.
If this type of gang violence by the police isn't punished to the fullest extent of the law, then sooner or later, the people will turn on those who are sworn to "protect and serve."
Olatunji Mwamba, Baltimore
The writer is an officer of the Maryland State Police.
Cyclone just part of warming world
Allstate Insurance recently received permission from the state to refuse to write new household policies on the Eastern Shore and in Southern Maryland. It made this decision citing concerns that "a warmer Atlantic Ocean will lead to an increase in the number of strong hurricanes" hitting the region ("Regulators clear Allstate in coast-coverage denial," Feb. 12).
Australia is experiencing its worst drought in 100 years.
And now more than 100,000 residents of Myanmar may die as the result of the cyclone that recently hit that country ("Myanmar lets in aid shipment, rejects U.S.," May 9).
These three events have a common thread: All are related to global warming. And yet I have seen nothing in the reporting in The Sun connecting the devastation in Myanmar to global warming.
The Sun is not alone in failing to report this connection. Few publications have done so.
But unless the public realizes the threat that global warming presents and acts accordingly, we will all be doomed to pay a significant price for it.
I hope The Sun will act responsibly in the future in reporting this threat.
Stanley L. Rodbell, Columbia
Columbia remains a model of idealism
While the writer of the letter "Columbia remains a 'company town'" (May 9) presents one view of Columbia and its future, there is more to this area than meets the eye.
This "company town" has been a bastion of enlightenment in urban planning and a place that respects diversity and respects the land. It was created as a "Garden for Growing People."
These ideals are what make Columbia the unique place that it is.
General Growth Properties, which purchased the Rouse Co., has created a development process that is open and includes residents, businesses, Howard County government and world-renowned consultants to meet with all of us in the community as the new downtown is planned.
Columbia is a many-company town, a residential town and a commuter town where the developer is linking capitalism with social justice.
Other jurisdictions can learn from Columbia, which, while not perfect, serves as a model of humane development.
Suzanne Waller, Columbia
Clinton is right to press her fight
Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign for president is proof of her bravery, determination, strength and steadfastness.
She is a strong, uncompromising, knowledgeable, articulate woman, and for that reason, men are screaming for her to quit ("Clinton fights on despite tall odds," May 8).
But it is precisely because she is a strong, uncompromising, knowledgeable, articulate woman that she should never, ever quit.
We are in the 21st century now; women can do whatever they darn well want.
Magie Dominic, New York