TEHRAN, Iran -- Iran watchers sought to make sense yesterday of a spat between the conservative speaker of parliament and the country's hard-line president over a budgetary issue that found Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei issuing a rare but opaque opinion.
The incident was the latest sign of discord with the Islamic Republic's byzantine ruling system, which combines elements of a democratically elected republic with a theocracy headed by Shiite Muslim clerics, with Khamenei over both.
"The implementation of all bills that follow constitutional channels is mandatory for all branches of the state," the statement read.
Some analysts and news reports described the statement as a slap at Ahmadinejad and his camp by Khamenei ahead of parliamentary elections March 14.
But others sharply disagreed.
"It's a dispute within the government because Ahmadinejad's been unable to deliver" on the economy, said Bijan Bidabadi, an economist and consultant. "This has nothing to do with the supreme leader."
A rift has emerged among conservatives, who worry about how they will fare in the upcoming vote in light of Ahmadinejad's poor economic performance, said another analyst.
"It shows that among the hard-liners, the gap is widening," said Saeed Allah-Bedashti, a politician close to the camp of the liberal-minded former President Mohammed Khatami. "But the gap is between Haddad-Adel and Ahmadinejad, not between the supreme leader and Ahmadinejad."
The world's fourth largest oil exporter, Iran and its state-dominated economy suffer from chronic unemployment estimated at up to 20 percent and an official inflation rate of 19 percent.
Monday's budgetary quarrel came amid an extraordinary cold snap across the Middle East that has depleted natural gas supplies and caused heating-supply shortages throughout Iran, especially in rural hamlets, which are the conservatives' base of support.
Iranian lawmakers voted to divert $1 billion to buy more natural gas. Ahmadinejad, apparently worried that pouring more cash into the economy would spur inflation, refused to implement the plan, calling parliament's decision unconstitutional.
Haddad-Adel turned to Khamenei, who issued an opinion that said all government branches must follow the constitution. Under Iran's legal system, laws are vetted by a committee of clerics called the Guardians Council, not the president. Disputes between parliament and the presidency must be mediated by the Expediency Council, which is led by Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani - a powerful cleric and politician who leads a faction opposed to Ahmadinejad.
Some saw Khamenei's intervention as a rare public rebuke against Ahmadinejad, who has largely tried to disregard the parliament since he took office in 2005, sometimes implementing rules and dissolving agencies without seeking lawmakers' approval.
Others read the supreme leader's statement as an attempt to restore some balance between a weakened parliament increasingly worried by the government's lack of progress on the economy and a president who tries to rule by fiat, at least on the economy. Though Khamenei by and large has stood by the president publicly, he is under pressure from factions within Iran's ruling circle to rein him in, analysts in Tehran said.
The incident was also seen as parliament standing up for its rights - though cautiously.
"In the past three years, (Haddad-Adel) saw the mismanagement and did nothing about it," said Emad Afroogh, a member of parliament critical of Ahmadinejad. "Even here, instead of delivering on his own constitutional responsibilities, he utilizes the supreme leader."
Ramin Mostaghim and Borzou Daragahi write for the Los Angeles Times.