Q: Baltimore is considering height limits for new buildings in the Mount Vernon area. Do you think the city needs more tall buildings and more density? Or would that ruin the charm of "Charm City"?
The Mount Vernon neighborhood is the greatest work of art that we Baltimoreans have ever created. After decades in the doldrums, the neighborhood is finally beginning to revive, and that is good news for all of us.
The city's Planning Department has just proposed a new urban renewal ordinance to guide future development in Mount Vernon.
With one exception, the new ordinance is wonderful.
Mount Vernon's two great attributes are historic architecture and a vibrant mix of uses; with one exception, the new rules would protect both features.
But that one exception is a doozy. The ordinance proposes to allow new buildings to be 230 feet tall along Charles Street. That would mean 23-story buildings in the very heart of Mount Vernon.
And this is very odd. No other American city allows skyscrapers in the center of great historic districts.
From Boston to Savannah, Ga., from New York to San Francisco, American cities put tall buildings on the fringes of historic districts, not in their heart, as our Planning Department is proposing.
The new Mount Vernon ordinance includes good design guidelines for new buildings. But planners are wrong to think that design alone will allow huge buildings to blend in with the small buildings of Mount Vernon.
You can dress a hippopotamus like a ballerina, but the result will be Fantasia, not ballet.
No one believes Mount Vernon should have height limits of three stories or five stories. And if you go to Mount Vernon today, you will see something like a dozen apartment houses of considerable size, and most of them fit in pretty well.
But a few buildings are too big, and the new ordinance opens the door to more of them.
We should close that door.
Mount Vernon is too important for us to take risks that no other American city is taking.
The writer is executive director of the Midtown Development Corp.
As a property owner and resident of Mount Vernon, I embrace the height and look forward to new construction that adds to the rich architectural beauty of one of Baltimore's best neighborhoods.
I believe that the city's urban renewal plan is an excellent tool to infuse Mount Vernon with the energy and thrust it needs to become not only a showcase of regional and national history but also a stellar example of a modern neighborhood that offers all the amenities of a world-class city.
For me, and for a large number of property owners in Mount Vernon, height is not the issue.
We believe that the integrity of a design and the architectural richness of a structure should take priority over its height.
We understand that the Empire State Building would be out of place in Mount Vernon.
But it is difficult to think of New York without such a magnificent building.
By embracing the height and accepting the proposed urban renewal plan, we may give Baltimore the opportunity to witness a building of imposing appearance and dignity- a building that will make everyone proud, and may even someday become yet another landmark in this architecturally stunning neighborhood.
Embrace the height, don't fight it.
Hector G. Manzano
As The Sun has reported, the city's Planning Department decided to ignore the voices of our community and propose allowing 230-foot buildings on the stretch of Charles Street north of the Washington Monument, a fact that pleases the development community ("Development groups praise new Mount Vernon height limits," June 8). But the majority of Charles Street's business and property owners are opposed to this plan, as are the majority of residents and many of our neighborhood's major institutions.
At 230 feet, a building would be not only taller than the Washington Monument but also higher than the magnificent Belvedere Hotel.
This plan would irreparably harm Mount Vernon. It would lead to blocking the views of the Belvedere from the south, and could change the entire skyline from that of a charming, historic neighborhood to a crass collection of gleaming, cold high-rises.
The community wants and encourages development of the empty parcels on Charles Street. But this could be done with a height limit of 100 feet, a point proved by the outstanding five-story Struever Bros. Eccles & Rouse development coming this year to Charles Street.
A 100-foot limit would ensure the survival and revitalization of our treasured historic neighborhood, whose revitalization is happening precisely because of its historic value and charm.
But put enormous towers in the middle of that charm and you will lose Mount Vernon forever.
The writer is president of the Mount Vernon-Belvedere Association.
Mount Vernon, Baltimore's first historic district, is nationally recognized for its historic character. But 230-foot buildings (20 or more stories) are just too tall to be placed alongside the neighborhood's historic architecture.
They would ruin the very charm and character Mount Vernon prides itself on and that are driving its current economic revitalization.
Let's have a plan with height limits that promote new development on the surface parking lots in Mount Vernon but also respect the neighborhood's history.
Other world-class historic places, such as Beacon Hill in Boston, Society Hill in Philadelphia and Charleston, S.C., strike such a balance.
There is no reason we in Baltimore can't do the same thing for our central historic neighborhood of Mount Vernon.
The writer is executive director of Baltimore Heritage.
Do I want taller buildings in Mount Vernon?
That is a simple question with a very simple answer: No.
Do you think Frommer's recognized Baltimore as one of the top 10 "up-and-coming" summer travel destinations in the world because we have tall buildings?
Every city has tall buildings, but not every city has a Mount Vernon.
Baltimore can use all the help it can get and should not discourage greater density or height in certain areas.
We have lots of room as the city continues to depopulate from year to year.
That said, one must question the wisdom of locating large-scale buildings in the center of a historic treasure such as Mount Vernon.
Perhaps it is time to certify Mount Vernon as a National Historic Landmark District similar to Annapolis' historic core. Federal protection along with development guidelines complying with Department of the Interior standards have an excellent record in preserving architectural character, increasing property values and elevating tax base.
In fact, the city needs to go one step further and protect the buildings, places and parks that result in the specific urban characteristics that make Mount Vernon so very special and unusual.
Let's do the smart thing and preserve what is best while rebuilding a world-class city with greater density.
Why not learn from past experience? The most vibrant areas in Baltimore are thriving because they stress the reuse and enhancement of their unique architectural resources.
New construction in old neighborhoods should respect the character of the area.
Inappropriate and out-of-place development is not a drawing card for new residents and business investment.
To allow new structures whose height overshadows the 19th-century character of Mount Vernon would insult one of the city's crown jewels.
New buildings should be good neighbors, not overpowering newcomers muscling their way into our history.
Let towering behemoths go elsewhere. Keep Mount Vernon Mount Vernon.
William Donald Schaefer
The writer is Maryland's state comptroller.