An appointed task force recommended yesterday that Carroll County use a five-member panel instead of a single administrator to enforce its ethics code.
The recommendation would combine aspects of the county's old system, which used a three-member ethics commission, and the current system, which entrusts ethics enforcement to a single administrator.
Under the recommendation, the county commissioners would name the five-member ethics panel, which then would appoint an administrator from among its members. The administrator would handle routine responsibilities of reviewing outside employment and financial disclosure from county employees and elected officials. The panel members would serve staggered three-year terms.
Task force members said yesterday that fewer questions of political favoritism would be raised if the panel - not the commissioners - appointed the administrator, who would be the most influential ethics enforcer.
"When it comes to ethics, I just don't think we can cut any corners," said Lisa Breslin, a member of the task force.
The commissioners will not be bound to follow the recommendation, expected to be submitted within three months by the task force as part of a completely rewritten ethics code.
The county had an ethics commission until the commissioners disbanded it last month, replacing it with an ethics officer, Richard J. Simmons. Carroll is the only county in the state using such a format, though the commissioners have said they are open to bringing back some form of ethics commission.
The county commissioners have asked the task force to suggest how best to combine the ethics officer with an ethics commission. Commissioner Dean L. Minnich has floated the idea of having the ethics officer refer investigations of complaints to citizens committees.
The commissioners pointed to political bias, incompetence and misuse of office as reasons for dismissing the old commission.