SUBSCRIBE

Track record of ordinance in the spotlight

THE BALTIMORE SUN

Bubbling up amid this year's political rhetoric is growing frustration over Howard County's decade-old law that tries to curb school crowding by slowing development.

Some candidates have talked of scrapping the system, while others defend it as a good tool that needs more tinkering, but no one is satisfied with the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO).

Time and again in recent years, those charged with administering APFO have failed to predict mushrooming school enrollments in fast-growing areas, causing widespread crowding, contentious redistricting and urgent demands for rapid school construction.

With a proposed school capital spending budget at $86.4 million, up 54 percent in a single year, and growing complaints about crowded schools and repeated school redistricting, there are concerns that Howard will not be able to afford to maintain the quality of its schools or other county services in the face of relentless growth.

"I call it IPFO - Inadequate Public Facilities Ordinance," quipped Lynne Bergling, a Democrat running for County Council in the congested Ellicott City area.

"If it cannot be changed to do what it is supposed to do, it should be replaced," she said, echoing doubts expressed by several officials - including Bergling's opponent, Republican Christopher J. Merdon.

Those doubts have popped up among a variety of candidates, and although the APFO law has not been at the forefront of political debate, clearly most people seeking county offices - from Merdon and Bergling to Elkridge Republican Brian Harlin and western county Democrat Stephen Musselman - want to see changes.

The law was tightened two years ago to include middle schools for the first time and to lower the threshold for crowding from 120 to 115 percent of capacity. Once a school reaches that level, development plans three years into the future are delayed until the county has time to solve the problem.

Intended to bring predictability to builders, parents, school and county officials, the law often has been known for the reverse. Needed new schools were delayed because of faulty enrollment projections and money problems. Parents were upset because of crowding and subsequent redistricting. Builders were displeased with delays.

Attempts to catch up caused sudden requests for expensive new buildings, upsetting county officials, too.

County Executive James N. Robey, a Democrat seeking re-election, says the county cannot afford the proposed 54 percent increase in school spending for the budget year that starts in July.

Robey said he would reconvene the citizens committee that created the APFO law to study possible changes.

"It's working better than it was, but there's still problems," he said, especially with the accuracy of school enrollment projections - despite the efforts of a consultant and much closer cooperation between county planners and school officials.

Robey has given up on the hope that county school enrollments will ever peak and then decline, removing pressure for more schools. That easing of school spending pressure had been routinely forecast by Howard planners and political leaders until recently.

Formulas incomplete

Joseph W. Rutter Jr., the county planning director, noted that the formulas used to predict school enrollment do not catch younger families replacing older ones in existing homes.

"If there is such a thing [as an enrollment peak], there will be more programmatic changes," said Robey, who noted that class-size reductions and all-day kindergarten can cost thousands of classroom seats.

APFO's defenders acknowledge its flaws but say it is better than nothing.

"It's not perfect. It was a compromise to begin with. It's way better than the nothing we had," said Del. Shane Pendergrass, who was a County Council member when the original law was passed.

Rutter said that as similar laws go nationwide, "this is one of the most predictable systems around," and county and school bureaucrats "have come light-years" in terms of working more closely together. "Is it perfect? No. Is it where it should be? No," he said. "I don't think we can afford to scrap it."

One alternative, charging builders development impact fees - even at $10,000 a house - would not produce enough money to build even one school addition, he said.

Steven H. Adler, the Republican candidate for county executive, said he feels that APFO "is getting closer" to its ideal, but needs more work. "I just don't believe at this point in time we need to reinvent the wheel. We could set ourselves back by starting over," he said.

Some, such as development critic John Taylor, an APFO committee member, say the law cannot work at the pace Howard County is growing. "The problem is not APFO and the solution is not APFO," he said.

County Council Republicans Allan H. Kittleman, of the western part of the county, and Merdon have been the most outspoken critics of the law at candidate forums, but even those who support the law, such as state Sen. Sandra B. Schrader, feel the system needs another look and more tinkering.

"It needs more than tweaking," Kittleman said. "I'm still not confident in the final product."

Kittleman is also facing election-year pressure from his opponent, Musselman, who accuses him of being too passive and "abdicating his role to the school board."

Merdon and County Councilman Guy J. Guzzone, a North Laurel-Savage Democrat, suggested that putting one agency in control could help. Now, responsibility is split between school officials, who supply enrollment figures, and county planners, who submit them to the county.

Diane Wilson, a Republican running against Guzzone, agrees that changes are needed.

Courtney Watson, a school board candidate who sat on the APFO committee, said that because of the three-year delay built into the law, it is too soon now to see the impact of changes in the system made two years ago.

"It's too early to say the changes have not worked, but it may be a case of too little, too late," she said, because the county fell so far behind in building classrooms.

Different problems

Other candidates see different problems.

C. Vernon Gray, an east Columbia Democrat and a 20-year council veteran, traced school congestion in the northeast corner of the county to decisions in the mid-1990s by former County Executive Charles I. Ecker not to build a northeast elementary school or an 11th high school. By the time enrollment projections made the need for both obvious, classes were overflowing in Ellicott City-area schools, and high school congestion was close behind.

The new elementary, Bellows Spring, has not opened but already has an addition planned, and the board's new plan calls for another new northeastern and a northern elementary to open by 2006.

Gray, who is running for state Senate against Schrader this year, defended the law, and said the county did not do its job.

"I fault us. We have a responsibility to the people for infrastructure," Gray said.

Schrader said she thinks the APFO "concept is tremendous, but something's wrong with the formula. It needs to be looked at, not thrown out."

Joan Lancos, a Republican running for County Council in west Columbia and a veteran of 10 years on the county Planning Board, applauded the school system's construction request as an attempt to get ahead of the problem, even though she, too, said the money is not there now.

Reactive vs. proactive

Problems are bound to occur, she said, "because [APFO is] reactive instead of proactive. The development appears and then they close the area for development." By then, she said, schools are already crowded.

"I'm very glad the school system came in with this enormous [capital] budget," even though it is "unattainable, because at least they put it on the table," she said. "They put it where the greatest need is. It looks farther ahead than next year."

She pointed to another possible solution to fast growth - cheaper modular classroom additions similar to those installed at crowded Pointers Run Elementary.

With 80 more classrooms needed for all-day kindergarten by 2007, and no money available, that could help, she said.

Kenneth S. Ulman, a Democrat opposing Lancos, said, "I'm inclined to think major changes should occur" [in APFO] to improve predictability, though the law "has done some things well," such as slowing growth overall.

Brian Harlin, a Republican running for County Council in east Columbia, said, "I think you've got to start over. They've played with it a lot of different times. They're not getting close."

Copyright © 2021, The Baltimore Sun, a Baltimore Sun Media Group publication | Place an Ad

You've reached your monthly free article limit.

Get Unlimited Digital Access

4 weeks for only 99¢
Subscribe Now

Cancel Anytime

Already have digital access? Log in

Log out

Print subscriber? Activate digital access