Coppin State isn't 'faltering' in its mission
While I appreciate The Sun's coverage of the appointment of Stanley F. Battle as incoming president of Coppin State College ("Coppin names next leader," Oct. 12), I regret that the phrase "Funding seen as crucial for faltering college" appeared in its subtitle.
In spite of enormous fiscal challenges, Coppin is not "faltering" in its mission of providing excellent teaching, research and service.
State, regional and national accreditation of the college and a variety of its programs; consistently high passing rates on licensing exams in such disciplines as education, nursing and social work for Coppin graduates; performances, publications and exhibitions of students' visual and performing arts work; and successful placements of students in internships and alumni in graduate schools and employment all attest to the effectiveness of Coppin's instructional programs.
And such initiatives as managing Rosemont Elementary School, establishing a nursing center, supporting the summer National Youth Sports Program and presenting the upcoming production of Black Masks, in which acting and dance students will portray the achievements of African-American heroes and "sheroes" before more than 300 schoolchildren, all attest to the college's commitment to serving the citizens of Baltimore and Maryland.
We at Coppin are challenged, but we are far from "faltering."
Judith D. Willner
Baltimore
The writer chairs the department of fine and communication arts at Coppin State College.
Insulting a president who makes us proud
The Sun's editorial "Married up" (Oct. 11) begins with the words, "One of the most predictable lines in President Bush's all-purpose stump speech is the introduction of his wife, Laura ... "
The most predictable thing about any Sun editorial -- or any commentary, cartoon or, indeed, much of its political news -- is that it will be mean, petty and biased. The editorial in question, in which the writer makes a lame attempt to put Mrs. Bush in a somewhat more favorable light than The Sun's usual treatment of the president, is no exception.
Its insulting and contemptuous descriptions of the president -- "he's cocky," "he's flip," "sometimes it seems he can barely talk" -- are unfair, unwarranted and betray The Sun's hatred for anyone who does not march to the tune of the liberal establishment and the leftist press.
If the first lady read the editorial, I'm certain that she became nauseated, and resentful of its narrow, bigoted and ragged treatment of her husband -- a president who has, during his first two years in office, made most Americans proud of their leader and his first lady for the first time in almost a decade.
Richard A. Conway
Timonium
State government earns poor marks
Two recent Sun articles left me confused and concerned.
One noted that the Chesapeake Bay Foundation says the bay's pollution level has not improved ("Bay pollution holds steady, report finds," Oct. 16). The other notes that Maryland has failed to provide information law enforcement needs to perform background checks to prevent felons, fugitives and the mentally ill from purchasing firearms ("Townsend denies fault for lapse on gun checks," Oct. 17).
If I were grading Lt. Gov. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend's administration, I'd give it an "F" on the environment and an "F" on gun control.
Bill Thies
Ellicott City
Time to try new path to combat crime
The Sun's article on Lt. Gov. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend's marks on fighting crime was overly generous. The fact is that over the last eight years the Glendening-Townsend administration has been a dismal failure on crime ("For Townsend, mixed marks on crime fight," Oct. 15).
Maryland has some of the most restrictive gun laws of any state. However, it ranks among the top five states in almost every violent crime statistic, including murder. Why? Because criminals do not follow the law and, when criminals are caught, Maryland gives them light sentences.
Ms. Townsend's ideas sound good to voters, but have little impact on reducing crime. As the article notes, the HotSpot program has been criticized by Mayor Martin O'Malley as a poor use of resources. And Break the Cycle has never achieved its goals.
A true leader would see these policies are not working and find another approach.
It is time to review the multitude of Maryland gun laws and give resources to the most effective. And to implement Project Exile so that criminals get stiff mandatory sentences.
Jeff Trimmer
Bel Air
Examine the ways citizens get guns
The Sun recently printed several articles detailing injustices and miscommunications in several city murder cases ("Justice Undone," Sept 29-Oct. 1).
How about doing a similar series that might help us with our gun problems by explaining how guns come into the city and how access to guns works in the city and surrounding counties?
And, in the case of assault rifles, how and when do they fall into the wrong hands?
Wouldn't such articles bring us more hope than incessant coverage of the sniper killings?
Dave Eberhardt
Baltimore
Arab militants fight for freedom, justice
The writer of the letter "Bulldozers are proper tools for fighting terror" (Oct. 15) said "Sun readers deserve the whole story" about Israel's bulldozing of homes of relatives of suicide bombers and leveling of homes in Jenin.
But the writer himself did not give the "whole story." He did not give the reason the suicide bombers and militants are fighting -- a reason that makes all the difference. They are fighting for freedom from Israeli occupation.
Four hundred thousand Israelis are illegally living on 58 percent of the West Bank and 20 percent of the Gaza Strip. The Geneva conventions and U.N. resolutions treat this occupation as illegal. And Israel's abuse of Palestinians' human rights is terrible.
So the suicide bombers and militants, in fighting for their property and their human rights, are fighting for justice.
I do not approve of suicide bombers or militants. But I understand their desire for freedom.
Bob Krasnansky
Ellicott City
Bali bombing merits much more attention
Headlines from Bali:
Oct. 13, Page 16: "171 killed in Bali nightclub bombing."
Oct. 14, Page 8: "Survivors, families try to come to grips with Bali explosion."
I wonder if Australia's papers buried the World Trade Center disaster in Pages 16 and 8 on Sept. 12 and Sept. 13 of 2001.
I wonder if their editors would have thought a story about an "egg megafarm" in Ohio was more important.
Ivan Pressman
Baltimore