City must support vulnerable citizens, not incarcerate...


City must support vulnerable citizens, not incarcerate them

We were concerned to read of the Downtown Partnership's plans to pursue legislation that would make it illegal to sleep or camp outdoors at night downtown ("Proposal seeks to revitalize the city," Oct. 26).

While we share Downtown Partnership president Laurie Schwartz' desire to ensure that persons experiencing homelessness "get help in shelters and medical facilities," the city simply does not have the shelter capacity to serve its several thousand citizens who lack a place to sleep each night.

Many of these individuals have mental illnesses, physical disabilities or addictions -- sometimes all three -- that prevent them from using existing shelters.

Despite the "treatment on request" policies of Mayor Kurt L. Schmoke and city Health Commissioner Dr. Peter Beilenson, access to substance abuse treatment for vulnerable, uninsured populations remains limited, at best.

The most needed resource for the homeless, residential treatment, is especially scarce. Long waiting lists are a major barrier to treatment -- and addicts, with no place to go, return to the streets.

In practice, the "continuum of care" for the homeless and the addicted remains little more than an alliterative title.

We have seen all too clearly the unfortunate result of criminalizing addiction: Correctional facilities overburdened with individuals whose primary "crime" is a treatable addiction.

The measure the Downtown Partnership suggests would only further criminalize the tragic reality of homelessness.

Providing appropriate addiction treatment and adequate social supports, however, would be a step forward for Baltimore.

Robert White Baltimore

The writer is president of Addiction Treatment Advocates of Maryland.

Where are the witnesses to city's other crimes?

As a former commander of the Baltimore police homicide and robbery units, it amazes me that whenever there's a police shooting, or an accusation of excessive force by the police, there's no shortage of so-called eyewitnesses who appear before the news media -- along with lawyers and politicians who pontificate about the perceived injustice.

Yet, in a city with more than 300 murders a year and thousands of assaults, robberies and drug deals, finding a witness in those cases is virtually impossible.

What does that say about our society?

John C. Barnold Timonium

Three cheers for Gregory Kane's recommendation that we give polygraph tests to the alleged eyewitnesses to the Larry Hubbard shooting ("You can't always trust eyewitness accounts," Oct. 30).

I agree with Mr. Kane that too many people are sitting in prison or on death row because of "eyewitness" testimony.

Let's give the justice system a chance -- and stop judging Officer Barry Hamilton before all the testimony is heard.

I fear that many people forget that had Mr. Hubbard not resisted arrest, the whole unfortunate incident never would have happened.

V. Christian Baltimore

Other Larry Hubbards can still be saved

Larry Hubbard's death could have been prevented. But where were the preachers, politicians, lawyers and community leaders while this young man was building an arms-length criminal record?

Why didn't the publicity-seeking preachers call their flocks together and go into the wilderness (the streets of East Baltimore) to save this young man from a life of crime?

Why didn't these dollar-hungry lawyers and tear-shedding witnesses come up with programs to save him?

There are many more Larry Hubbards out there in the wilderness. It's not to late to save them.

Mildred Player Baltimore

Slavery, not abolitionist, should be 'notorious'

I am willing to wager that no one of African-American descent had anything to do with the photograph captions for The Sun's recent article on Civil War relics ("Bidding war," Oct. 26).

Referring to John Brown as a "notorious abolitionist" seems rather pale.

One would think that, in a time when men were enslaving other men, Malcolm X's philosophy of "by any means necessary" ought to apply.

David Simon Baltimore

National pastime reflects our national prejudices

My congratulations to George Mitrovich and John "Buck" O'Neil for "Blacks play catch-up in national game" (Oct. 24). I love the game of baseball and its heroes. Jackie Robinson was not only a baseball Hall of Famer, but a civil rights leader.

However, when I worked in a baseball museum, my effort to boost black attendance fell on on deaf ears. When I visit Camden Yards, most of the black people I see seem to be stadium workers.

Today, it is much easier for city youth to play basketball than to search for a baseball diamond in good condition and find enough equipment to play.

Major League Baseball is exactly like corporate America: It's run mainly by middle-aged white men, who don't care as long as the seats are filled.

The American game is sadly a direct commentary on how many whites see America and African-Americans.

Timothy Nevels Randallstown

Some boxing divisions still boast real champions

The Sun's stinging indictment "Pro boxing is broken and it can't be fixed" (Perspective, Oct. 31) certainly scored valid points against Mike Tyson and his promoter. But should this tar and feather the whole sport of boxing?

Magnification of the heavyweight division's woes shouldn't call forth death metaphors for all amateur and pro classes.

Misty references to yesteryear's legends, such as Joe Louis, Floyd Patterson, Rocky Marciano and Muhammad Ali, should be replaced by recognition of Oscar de la Hoya, Roy Jones, Costas Tzu and other bona fide champions.

Syd Machat Keedysville

We're taxed enough without the estate tax

It is ridiculous to tax a person's estate. The deceased's money has already been taxed enough.

It was taxed when it was earned, when it accrued interest -- and God knows when else.

Maryland and federal estate taxes should be eliminated. After all, when the heirs make interest on any money they inherit, they'll be taxed for that too.

L. Rivera Crownsville

What about Sarbanes' other challenger?

The day after Paul Rappaport announced his intention to run for U.S. Senate, The Sun ran an article about Mr. Rappaport and the only apparent campaign activity he has conducted so far -- a telephone poll ("Republican begins bid to unseat Sarbanes," Oct 21) .

The other declared candidate for Paul Sarbanes' Senate seat is Robin Ficker.

Mr. Flicker has been campaigning nearly every day for the past two-and-a-half years. He has met many thousands of Maryland citizens at shopping centers, parades, festivals, sporting events and mass transit stops all over the state.

An article about Robin Ficker, and what he has learned through his personal campaign about what's really important to Marylanders, belongs in The Sun.

Francine Kwiatkowski Columbia

To our readers

The Sun welcomes letters from readers. All letters become the property of The Sun, which reserves the right to edit each letter. By submitting a letter, the author grants The Sun an irrevocable, non-exclusive right and license to use and republish the letter, in whole or in part, in all media and to authorize others to reprint it.

Letters should be less than 200 words and include the writer's name, address and day and evening telephone number.

Letters can be mailed to The Sun, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore 21278-0001, e-mailed to or faxed to 410-332-6977. Include phone numbers on electronic submissions.

Copyright © 2021, The Baltimore Sun, a Baltimore Sun Media Group publication | Place an Ad