Sexual education can help teen-agers make healthy choices
Tony Snow's column "Sex education policy promotes promiscuity" (Opinion Commentary, Oct. 18) was brimming with myths and misinformation. Contrary to Mr. Snow's diatribe, sexuality education is an invaluable way of helping young people avoid sexual risk-taking that can lead to pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections.
According to a study from the Centers for Disease Control, 66 percent of high school students have intercourse before they graduate.
Comprehensive sexuality education can give young people a clear picture of the risks and consequences of unprotected intercourse and empower them to make responsible choices.
Numerous studies show that a balanced approach, combining abstinence with safer sex messages is the most effective way to guide young people to healthy decisions. There is no evidence that "abstinence-only" programs help teen-agers.
Mr Snow's allegation that sexuality education programs weaken family ties is just wrong. A recent poll found that 67 percent of teens who had talked openly with a parent about sex would speak to a parent first if they were considering beginning a relationship.
Unfortunately, frank talk and sexuality education is lacking across the country. Thirteen states don't require schools to provide any sexuality education and only five percent of American students receive age-appropriate sex education throughout their public school careers.
This lack of sexuality education may explain why the our teen pregnancy and abortion rates are the highest among all industrialized nations.
The encouraging news is that 85 percent of American adults recognize the need for sexuality education in schools.
Unlike Mr. Snow, these parents recognize that a small investment in sexuality education can offer guidance that can last a lifetime.
Roberta G. Antoniotti Baltimore
The writer is president and chief executive officer of Planned Parenthood of Maryland.
Who is Tony Snow and what sources did he use for a column so full of inaccuracies and absurd accusations?
The sexuality education curricula Mr. Snow mentioned have been evaluated, and found effective in reducing risky behaviors associated with HIV, sexually transmitted diseases and teen pregnancy.
I've been been trained to train others in these programs. I've never seen the sorts of examples Mr. Snow cited.
I was never trained "to humiliate students who believe in abstinence," nor would I train others in this disrespectful and irresponsible approach.
Abstinence is the safest decision for adolescents, but refusing unprotected intercourse is another important message we need to stress to help young people make safe and healthy decisions.
Mr. Snow says such programs keep parents in the dark. But the "Reducing the Risk" curriculum offers detailed steps for securing parental permission and keeping them informed. Students in the program have reported increased parent/child communication on sexuality issues.
Mr. Snow wrote, "Never mind that abstinence education is far more successful at reducing pregnancy." What proof does he have of this claim?
I know of no abstinence-only curriculum that has been proven effective. But the more comprehensive approach has been proven to postpone initiation of sexual intercourse and increase protective practices among sexually active youth.
The Sun is the major paper for a city that has some of the nation's worst statistics on sexually transmitted diseases, HIV and teen pregnancy. I urge it to get the facts about these programs' effectiveness.
Nancy Hudson Ellicott City
Rep. Cummings' behavior doesn't reflect district . . .
I was greatly offended by The Sun's article on Rep. Elijah E. Cummings' financial woes ("As Cummings rose, financial problems grew," Oct. 17).
I live in Mr. Cunnings district. I do not have children out of wedlock; I do not drive an uninsured vehicle; I do not have $7,000 of credit cards bills and I certainly know that paying my taxes is a "priority."
This man no more represents me, or anyone I know, than the man in the moon.
Mary R. Jones Catonsville
. . . but are his finances a matter of public concern?
I am wondering why The Sun's article about Rep. Elijah Cummings' finances was written or published ("As Cummings rose, financial problems grew," Oct. 17).
Like many others, I am not interested in Mr. Cummings' personal finances -- only in the job he's doing in Washington.
Is there so little going on in the Baltimore area that The Sun has to stoop to such low levels of journalism?
The local newspaper is just another reason not to be proud of the city that doesn't read.
Wenda Royster Baltimore
Would someone please tell me why The Sun finds it necessary to research the finances of every black public official or potential office holder in Maryland?
I'm almost sure that white office holders have perfect credit and have never been late paying any bills. This is evident because The Sun has never reported negative information on them.
But I'm not interested in any of these people's finances.
Bob Fountain Sr. Baltimore
First woman judge deserved more respect
It was disheartening to read the headline The Sun chose for the recent appointment of the first woman judge to the Circuit Court in Denton, "Denton OK with wife of prosecutor as judge" (Oct. 19).
By The Sun's own account, Karen Murphy Jensen is an able, respected attorney well-deserving of the post.
That The Sun chose to identify her first as, "wife of Caroline's [County] state's attorney . . ." before even mentioning her name, is demeaning to Ms. Jensen and her recent appointment.
I recognize that the intent was to point to the seeming conflict of interest when one marriage partner may rule on cases presented by the other.
The article promptly notes, however, that this is neither new, nor much of a challenge, citing three examples of similar apparent conflicts.
More newsworthy is that Judge Jensen will be the only woman to sit on this circuit court. This was more worthy of the headline.
Brian Sutherland Baltimore
Some brain cancers really can be cured
As the mother of a brain cancer survivor, I read with great interest The Sun's article "Expanding fight against brain cancer" (Oct. 19) and I believe it could be misleading to patients and families who are fighting that battle.
As the article mentioned, there are more than 100 types of brain cancers. But the article improperly lumps them together, giving the impression that even the disease's curable forms are incurable and that patients have little hope.
Statements such as, "In nearly every case, tumors come back" and "even the best neurosurgeons in the world can't remove all of a malignant brain tumor" may be true for certain types of tumors, but not for all types.
My son is a living testament to the skill of surgeons and doctors at the Johns Hopkins Hospital and the success of standard forms of treatment for some malignant brain tumors.
Please give readers a fuller picture: there is hope and doctors every day cure many types of brain tumors.
Deborah G. Schwartz Baltimore
To our readers
The Sun welcomes letters from readers. They should be no longer than 200 words and should include the name and address of the writer, along with day and evening telephone numbers.
Send letters to Letters to the Editor, The Sun, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore 21278-0001. Our fax number for letters is 410-332-6977. The e-mail address is email@example.com.
All letters are subject to editing.
Do you support the proposal to reduce or eliminate Maryland's inheritance tax? Would you prefer that the state's budget surplus support other forms of tax relief or public investment?
Write us with your thoughts.