In response to the article ("Mayor has his own fix for courts," Feb. 19), I thought further explanation on my position concerning the Baltimore Circuit Court was in order.
While many observers seem to have just discovered this "court crisis," I have watched it brewing for some time now and have actively sought a remedy.
For the past 10 years, the city administration has included in its legislative agenda the request that the state assume the cost of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. Recent events relating to the problems of the criminal justice system in the city suggest that this major reform, which we have supported for more than a decade, is an idea whose time has come.
Most citizens do not know that all levels of the court system, except the circuit courts (or trial courts), are paid for by state government. The reason for this structure is a matter of politics and history, not policy and analysis.
Because funding for the circuit courts depends on the financial situation of the counties rather than the economic strength of the state, citizens are left with a trial court system in which a high-income county with low crime is able to spend relatively more on the courts than a low-income county with high crime. This disparity creates problems for the entire state and is the reason that state government intervention is appropriate.
Several years ago, at our request, the governor and the General Assembly examined two institutions then under the exclusive control of the city: the jail and the community college. The jail was suffering from severe overcrowding and other problems. It became clear that the problems of the city jail had a huge impact on the state because 50 percent of the inmates in the state prison system came from one subdivision -- Baltimore.
The state takeover brought the additional resources required to address overcrowding and other matters designed to comply with the federal court decree directed at the jail. Along those same lines, the state assumption of the cost of the community college brought the kind of resources that allowed that institution to become one of the fastest growing institutions of higher education in the state. This benefited the students, the business community and the entire state, which needed an effective city community college to address the needs for a well-trained work force.
Today, I doubt anyone would find fault with the judgments made by state elected officials regarding their decisions to assume the costs of the jail and the community college.
Although the politics are difficult, the policy rationale supporting the state assumption of the costs of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City is compelling. Given the modest annual growth in the city's general fund, it is unlikely that we will be able to increase dramatically the budget of the Circuit Court.
This court system can improve with a combination of management reforms and additional resources. Both will be required to produce the kind of results all citizens desire. The work of this court has an impact on the rest of the criminal justice system throughout Maryland.
And, of course, the effectiveness of the criminal justice system has a tremendous impact on the quality of life for all of our citizens. The time is now to improve the effectiveness of that system by this major reform affecting the Circuit Court for Baltimore City.
Mayor Kurt L. Schmoke, Baltimore
Story shed some light on dealer-landlords -- now give them heat
The Sun is to be highly commended for ripping away the cloak of anonymity under which the drug-dealing vermin who infest our city not only ruin lives with their trade but also terrorize the tenants of houses bought with their ill-gotten gains.
The arrogant victimization of the poor is a crime for which no penalty should be too severe nor no place in hell too hot.
At the risk of offering unsolicited advice to professionals from an amateur, perhaps police officials could set up a special hot line by which tenants and their neighbors could report the movement of these landlords, enabling them to be shadowed very closely by a special team of officers.
Such a system might have discouraged the kind of violence and intimidation of tenants described in your article. In my opinion, a little harassment of convicted drug dealers is long overdue.
John D. Schiavone, Kingsville
Baltimore County has fill of juvenile treatment homes
With regard to placing a group home for troubled teens in Worthington Valley or Randallstown, the real question is not why me, but why us?
Why is Baltimore County the jurisdiction in the state with the most juvenile treatment facilities?
These unfortunate children with complex problems are not only living in the middle of our communities, they are overburdening our schools, which lack the funds to adequately educate and care for them.
The Baltimore County delegation in Annapolis needs to stand up and be counted with its constituents and say, "Enough already!" Let some other jurisdictions participate more fully in the treatment and education of these disturbed youth.
Mary Pat Kahle, Timonium
Mayor Schaefer cared more for visitors than residents
I am a longtime resident of Baltimore City and someone who does not share the favorable view that 62 percent of the people in the Baltimore Poll have of William Donald Schaefer.
I was interested in Michael Olesker's column "Schaefer becomes a player in mayor race" (Feb. 18) about Mr. Schaefer entering the mayoral race.
What a different and vibrant city this would be if Mr. Schaefer had spent his weekends riding around the city and calling school administration officials. He could have told them: "I saw a lot of young people wandering around the city who go to public schools and are not getting a proper education and are destined for a life of poverty and despair. I am not going to tell you who they are or what city schools they go to, but I want the situation rectified or heads are gonna roll."
What a shame this very talented man spent all his time making the city a nice, clean place to visit when it needed someone who cared about the people who actually lived in it.
Michael A. Wehner, Baltimore
Arnick's ethics explanation sounds like a fairy tale
What a travesty! To no one's surprise but everyone's disappointment, Del. John S. Arnick and his subcommittee performed an effective hatchet job on the proposed ethics reform bill.
The suggested amendments would practically eviscerate the recommendations of U.S. Rep. Benjamin Cardin and the task force.
Mr. Arnick and his subcommittee see no problem in soliciting lobbyists for contributions to charities. The charity may be, and often is, loosely defined. And anyone believing that a lobbyist paying for meals is not expecting something in return also believes in the Tooth Fairy.
Mr. Arnick says that it's OK to accept tickets to the stadiums because the legislators should see what they paid for. It would seem that a better evaluation could be made when the stadium is empty rather than jammed with spectators. And it wouldn't require an admission ticket.
Abner Kaplan, Baltimore
War generation delivered when country needed it
Kudos to letter writer J. E. Hamilton Bailey ("Generation's achievements and sacrifices were great," Feb. 10) for his accurate assessment of Tom Brokaw's "Greatest Generation."
Our generation endured the Great Depression and faced the war years. Our rewards are in knowing that we gave all we could when our country badly needed us.
Earl D. Henck, Timonium
To our readers
The Sun welcomes letters from readers. They should be no longer than 200 words and should include the name and address of the writer, along with day and evening telephone numbers.
Send letters to Letters to the Editor, The Sun, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore 21278-0001. Our fax number for letters is 410-332-6977. The e-mail address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
All letters are subject to editing.
Pub Date: 2/24/99