Must know our heroes when we see them
Recently, I was sitting on my porch in Ocean City watching the crowd go by when I spotted a senior citizen coming my way in the tow of a little girl. As he drew closer I estimated he must be in his 90s. He was stooped by the years and his head was down. What caught my eye was the hat he was wearing. It was a very old twisted blue ball cap. On the front it said USS Pompon and below the lettering was embroidered a set of submarine dolphins.
I stood and moved to the porch rail and said "excuse me" as he approached. He had a bright face and had to turn his whole body when he looked up, as if he had a neck problem. I asked if the hat was an original. He answered that it was. I told him that I used to be a submarine sailor and in the early '60s had tied up next to the Pompon in San Diego.
The man's eyes sort of lit up at meeting another submarine sailor here in Ocean City and he asked me a couple of questions about which submarines I was on and when I got out of the Navy. Then he said he had gotten off the Pompon in 1946 after six wartime patrols.
Knowing a little about war patrols by U.S .submarines, I realized what this man had been through. The all-volunteer U.S. submarine force lost more men as a percentage than any other branch of service during World War II.
During the early months of the war after Pearl Harbor, it was decided that the fight must be carried to the shores of the enemy: They simply could not be allowed to strike such a blow and go unpunished. The people of Japan must know what war was and what their leaders had engaged them in. The role fell to the submarines. They were the only credible sea-going fighting force immediately after Dec. 7, 1941.
Their boldness and bravery served them well, they succeeded in their mission and gave our country the time needed to regain strength on the high seas. But what a terrible price the submarines paid in loss of life and equipment. A full 50 percent of the submarines were lost, most through hostile action.
So, here I was talking to one of those brave fighting men of my childhood that time has forgotten. I have reason to believe he lived in the Baltimore area but before we could say any more the little girl tugged at his shirt and said, "Come on, grandpa, they're calling us."
As he began to move on he put out his hand and I gladly shook it. He asked if he could come back later and sit a spell and talk. I told him he was welcome anytime and he moved on down the street.
As I watched him go I was struck by the notion that I had just shook the hand of a real American hero. Not one manufactured by commercials, but one that willingly put his life on the line for all of us. For the next few days I waited and watched for him but he didn't show. I regret not getting to spend more time with him. I'm sure his stories would be spellbinding. More than that, I regret not saying, "thank you."
Harold C. Earls
The rich get richer under Dole's tax plan
The latest study on distribution of wealth in the U.S. shows the gap between rich and poor is growing larger. Now presidential candidate Bob Dole wants to make a bad situation worse by recommending a huge tax cut that favors primarily the wealthy.
Repealing the 1993 tax increase, which he claims was the largest in U.S. history, would make the rich even richer. Almost all of the 1993 tax increase was imposed on the high-income population, with little or no increase on low- and middle-income taxpayers. In fact, the income tax credit for the poor was increased.
Mr. Dole's other proposal is a 15 percent across-the-board decrease in taxes. Obviously, the major beneficiaries of such a tax cut would be the wealthy. There would be insignificant savings for middle-income families and no benefit at all for the poor, whose income is so low that they pay no income tax. . . .
Governor always opposed slots
The Sun did a disservice to its readers by misrepresenting Gov. Parris Glendening's position on slot machines at Maryland racetracks.
After Mayor Kurt L. Schmoke told The Sun he had made a "deal" with Mr. Glendening to legalize slot machines, the governor issued a statement that explicitly denied any such agreement.
Contrary to The Sun's front-page stories, the governor's position never changed from being the same as it has been for the past six months. In fact, the governor's position on slots is the same as The Sun's editorial position.
The writer is executive director of NOcasiNO.
Hypocrisy revealed in welfare debate
President Clinton, who originally was going to increase funding for job training and day-care in order to "end welfare as we know it," has instead decided to cave in to the most mean-spirited elements in the U.S. Congress.
What was rarely mentioned in the welfare debate was that the Federal Reserve (and its Wall Street patrons) has an official policy of raising interest rates -- and slowing the economy -- whenever the employment rate becomes too high. The fundamental problem is not welfare but structural unemployment and simply surviving in a winner-take-all economy.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, most of those receiving public assistance are children, battered women, adults who through no fault of their own are unemployed or those who are working at low-wage, no-benefit jobs.
Certainly the meager welfare allowance to low-income families has never been an incentive not to work. However, if, as The Sun argues in its July 25 editorial, "welfare has become more lucrative than work," it is due to the fact that low-wage, no-benefit jobs simply do not pay enough to lift a family out of poverty.
Rather than implementing a true living wage or raising the earned income tax credit to make work pay for low-wage workers, Congress has decided to cut food stamp funding and deny financial aid to legal immigrants. In what can only be characterized as outrageous hypocrisy, politicians have called for balancing the budget by cutting programs that benefited the less fortunate, while the Pentagon has received billions more than it requested, and huge tax breaks have been proposed for corporations.
While it may be desirable to scrap the demeaning welfare system, children have to eat. There is a cruel irony in extolling the work ethic when there is no work or when the jobs which are available are temporary, part-time, and pay wages which are not sufficient to support a family.
R. E. Lears
Olympic officials follow tradition
I along with many others was frustrated first by the failure of the president of the International Olympic Committee to mention the tragic 1972 Munich murder of the Israeli at the opening day ceremonies of the Atlanta event and then by the dismissal of that tragedy as being inconsequential in comparison to the bombing in Atlanta. Unfortunately, the current IOC president is simply following a long tradition of that committee, originating from the time of Avery Brundage.
During his long reign, Brundage was primarily responsible for moving the 1936 Olympics to Berlin, giving the Nazi regime a showcase, and for the later decision that the games must go on immediately after the terrorist massacre of 11 Israeli athletes and finally for the unconscionable decision to fail to restore the medals stripped from Jim Thorpe after the 1912 contest where Thorpe's main competition was the same Avery Brundage in the pentathlon and the decathlon.
The tradition of the IOC -- or its officials -- is not one to be proud of.
Pub Date: 8/14/96