Changes anger zone residents Empowerment board acted without enough input, critics contend


After months of debate and deliberations, the empowerment zone that is emerging in Baltimore differs in ways both profound and subtle from the book-length application that earned the city the coveted $100 million federal revitalization program nearly a year ago.

The biggest change is in the increased emphasis being put on job creation and training at the expense of big-ticket social welfare programs.

Less dramatic but nonetheless significant are the alterations within programs to foster economic development and train workers; possible redirection of millions of dollars for education -- and the apparent end to a number of smaller initiatives in the application.

With the first dollars about to be spent in the neighborhoods, the changes -- made by a 29-member quasi-public board overseeing the city's effort in a series of meetings -- have upset some community leaders within the empowerment zone. Their complaint: residents have not had enough say in the decisions.

Arlene Fisher, president of the Lafayette Square Community Association in West Baltimore, says the board, which includes only a handful of empowerment zone residents, is not representative of the community.

"One of the points of the application was that the community was supposed to take ownership," said Ms. Fisher. "The way the board is set up, it's like the gas and electric board. It's an outside group of people making decisions for the community. That's a vast gulf right there."

Arnold K. Sherman -- a board member of the Pigtown "village center," one of half a dozen entities conceived of as links between neighborhoods and the central Empower Baltimore Management Corp. -- makes much the same point.

"From the day the award was given [Dec. 20, 1994], there has not been enough communication between the village center, the empowerment zone board and the federal level," he said. "We haven't been involved."

Empowerment zone board chairman Mathias J. DeVito said he understands the views of some community members and sympathizes with them.

But Mr. DeVito, the chairman of the Rouse Co., said the board had to make a decision whether to wait for more community reaction or to develop plans and priorities to free up the federal money so it can be spent. "We opted to move forward so things could happen," he said.

In the future, he said, the board will be kept apprised of community concerns through the village centers and an 80-odd member advisory council, half of whose members live in the zone, which includes some of the city's most distressed neighborhoods in East, West and South Baltimore.

At an Oct. 5 meeting the board decided to make job creation and training the top priorities of the empowerment zone, virtually taking all but a handful of social welfare programs off the agenda.

The decision was itself a change from the application. That application envisioned roughly splitting $80 million of the $100 million in federal grants among three areas: education and job preparation, health and family development, and economic opportunities. The other $20 million was to be split among community mobilization, housing, public safety, administration and evaluation.

Now it looks like economic development will get more than a third of the entire $100 million, with at least another $15 million directed to job training.

Baltimore's application -- one of six to be selected nationwide from 78 cities -- was in response to federal guidelines that attempted to create a new urban initiative by melding the Republican idea of leveraging economic development money with tax breaks and traditional Democratic precepts of social programs.

The key new element embraced by the board this month was the expenditure of an additional $15 million for a revolving fund to provide venture capital for businesses willing to expand or locate in the empowerment zone. That is on top of money for such initiatives as loan funds and the development of new industrial areas in Fairfield and Carroll Park.

Financing for the new fund is likely to come from several programs listed in the application that have little board support or have already been scuttled. They include nearly $10 million for family development, $6.7 million for child development and $3 million for preventive health care.

Many board members expressed skepticism that spending large chunks of the $100 million on social programs would have any appreciable effect on residents and questioned how the

programs would be sustained once the empowerment zone funds ran out. By using the money to encourage business development, they argued, the city's property and income base could be increased, thereby creating a stable source of funds for social programs.

Indeed, with 70,000 residents in the empowerment zone, if all the $100 million in federal funds money were spent on social programs, it would work out to just $1,400 per person. Even if the money was directed to the 40 percent of the zone population living in poverty -- some 28,000 people -- it would amount to just $3,600 each.

Among the programs to foster economic development and train workers cited in the application, a program to set up a residential job corps satellite center for troubled youth has been scuttled for lack of a suitable site.

Subtle but significant shifts include a cut in a $2.5 million entrepreneurial development fund to $500,000, to be offered through a business empowerment center providing assistance to small businesses, and the inclusion of $400,000 earmarked specifically to train zone residents for jobs in life sciences in a general pool of employment money.

The rationale for both changes -- the first made in April, the second last month -- was that money needed to be spent in areas with the greatest chances of creating a lasting impact.

In applying for an empowerment zone, the city touted annual personal education plans for each student and "affordable before and after school and weekend programs that will provide a rich mix of educational, recreational, artistic and multicultural activities."

Now, the idea for personal education plans, budgeted at $1 million, has been scrapped. And the board is considering reallocating the $5 million for the extended school program to put one of three innovative programs, including the Calvert School curriculum, in all schools in the zone. Also seemingly destined for the chopping block are a number of small community-based programs costing less than $1 million each -- touted in the application as new ways of doing business but dismissed by many board members.

These include community inspection review boards to try to settle landlord-tenant disputes and at least one neighborhood mediation center to serve as an alternative to court in handling minor criminal complaints, juvenile matters and civil dispute.

Mr. DeVito said the board is leery of spreading the empowerment zone too thin. "We can't choose too many things," he said. "The board is putting a circle around the big things that matter."

Copyright © 2019, The Baltimore Sun, a Baltimore Sun Media Group publication | Place an Ad