U.S. citizen's arrest by China deplored
Our deteriorating relations with China have reached a critical stage.
At the very time Congress is becoming neo-isolationist, the president lacks strength and vision and the United Nations is proving feckless we are confronted with a direct challenge to our sovereignty.
A U.S. citizen, Harry Wu, was illegally captured and imprisoned by the gerontocratic dictatorship that governs 20 percent of the world's population.
The Chinese government held, and may still be holding, a U.S. citizen incommunicado and without any charges against him.
Harry Wu is offensive to China because he speaks the truth about the crimes of its totalitarian regime.
He has documented human rights abuses and corruption, including the involuntary extraction and sale of prisoner organs as well as the mass export of prisoner-produced goods.
Mr. Wu, now 58 years old, has spent half his adult life in Chinese prisons, where he has been tortured and traumatized.
Instead of enjoying the remainder of his life in freedom, as an American citizen, Harry Wu has become a hero and a symbol of hope for all those suffering in Chinese forced-labor camps.
The first responsibility of any government is the protection of its citizens. This is especially true for the world's most powerful democracy. The case of Harry Wu is not about politics or economics, it's about our most cherished principles.
The question now is whether our government will uphold the principle that every law-abiding citizen is protected from kidnap and incarceration by a foreign power as well as the right of all Americans to speak the truth about human rights atrocities.
Roger C. Kostmayer
Md. too hasty in closing foster home
The Maryland Board of Public Works acted precipitously in cutting off funding for a program for former foster children ("Foster care program closed, state to probe," July 1).
While some of the young adults in the program may have committed crimes, that does not excuse the board from its responsibility to promote the best interests of all the young people involved.
Should 50 be punished for the sins of two?
The former foster children had been remanded to custody of the state because of abuse, neglect or abandonment by their parents or guardians.
The state was to act in place of the parents to protect them.
State Comptroller Louis Goldstein and the other members of the board thus have a special responsibility to protect these residents.
Although the former foster children's chronological age makes them adults in a sense, the law extends services to them until age 21 in recognition of the obvious fact that many people -- especially victims of abuse and neglect -- are not ready for adulthood in today's society at age 18.
Mr. Goldstein is described in the article as not being particularly concerned about moving participants on short notice, and he is quoted as saying, "They have places to put these people."
I can't believe Mr. Goldstein would be so unconcerned about the welfare of the participants if he were fully informed of the difficulties faced by these young people and of the scarcity of suitable living arrangements for them.
The board could have pursued its responsibility to investigate the New Pathways program and to evaluate the expenditure of state funds without jeopardizing the young people simply by setting a 15- or 30-day deadline for action.
As it stands, many of the participants were victimized once by their natural parent and now again by their substitute parent -- the state.
Iris Ann Gordon
Regarding overtime pay for state troopers to catch speeders on our highways, the public would be better served if the troopers spent their time catching real criminals.
As for $50,000 of Department of Transportation funds to pay the overtime, the public's tax dollars would be better spent fixing potholes.
Finally, as for increasing the speed limit only on rural highways, why is population density the sole factor used in determining the safe speed for a highway?
Take a look at I-95 between the Baltimore and Washington beltways. If ever there was a road deserving a higher speed limit, it's this one, designed for high-speed and high-volume transportation through a heavily populated area.
Life is an onion
Recent pronouncements from the medical community give one reason to question its objectives.
As the practitioners of the healing sciences continue to circumvent the actuarial tables of the life insurance industry, by extending our life expectancy, they have dropped the ball when it comes to the quality of these added years.
A visit to any institution specializing in geriatric care will substantiate this. So long as the quality of life of the elderly is ignored, there will continue to exist "a thing worse than death."
James Huneker compared life to an onion: "You peel off layer after layer and then you find there is nothing in it."
J. Bernard Hihn
The president's address to Chicago police officers on the subject of bullets capable of piercing protective vests was meant to be inflammatory and not a reasonable statement of concern ("Clinton takes aim at NRA," July 1).
As Robert O. Grover of U.S. News and World Report pointed out in a May 22 editorial: "The term 'cop-killer' used to describe ammunition is unnecessarily inflammatory . . . I would call any bullet aimed at a police officer a 'cop-killer.' "
President Clinton has from day one divided the country as no other president ever has done. If he is truly interested in bringing the country together, I suggest he tone down his rhetoric.
Edward C. Straley
It is undeniable that Ken Morgan and Sam Westrick, the gay couple who adopted two children, are indeed a family ("Single-parent adoption is common option for gay couples," June 24).
They experience the same excitement and joy over their children and face the same trials and tribulations as all families.
The fact that they are two men is of little consequence. But the fact that they are two successful, loving parents is of great consequence.
What else could a child ask for?
Cut their benefits
If the "family cap" has not had the desired effect on the number of new births to welfare mothers, then it's clear that they are able to provide for the extra children with the checks they were getting.
That means they were getting more money then is necessary to support them. In order to preserve the status quo, we should reduce the benefits given to welfare mothers. Maybe that will have an effect.