If the public has learned one thing about Bruce C. Bereano, it's never to count him out.
Yesterday the lobbyist was back in court to persuade a panel of judges to allow him to continue practicing law while he appeals his seven-count fraud conviction.
Many people, included his sentencing judge, believed that losing his law license under the circumstances was inescapable. But ++ several of the scarlet-robed judges of the Maryland Court of Appeals signaled sympathy with Mr. Bereano's arguments.
Their toughest questions yesterday were reserved for the lawyer representing the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, which is seeking the suspension of Mr. Bereano's license.
The judges made barely a peep to challenge Mr. Bereano.
"I was expecting more questions," he said afterward. "I don't know what to make of it. I don't predict things."
Melvin Hirshman, bar counsel for the Attorney Grievance Commission, refused to read anything into the judges' questioning.
"There is no argument that goes the same," he said. He predicted the court would file its decision by mid-July.
Mr. Bereano was convicted in November of fraudulently billing clients of more than $16,000 to make illegal campaign contributions that were channeled through employees of his law firm, family members and the Bereano political action committee. Mr. Bereano avoided a prison term when a federal judge concluded that no one had been harmed by his crimes. In fact, the judge said, his clients might actually have been helped.
State rules say a lawyer's license can be suspended for any criminal act that reflects adversely on his "honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer."
Kendall Calhoun of the Attorney Grievance Commission yesterday urged the court to suspend the license because Mr. Bereano's crimes involved dishonesty. The conviction has tarnished his trustworthiness as a lawyer and the profession in general, she said. In such cases, the court routinely suspends a lawyer's license, she added.
"What the court has before it is a jury that found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt," she said.
But Judge John C. Eldridge had a different idea.
"The federal judge said he did not think there was any dishonesty -- that's what we have as of now," he said.
Another judge called the case unique.
"I don't think we've ever had here a case where the victims didn't think of themselves as victims," said Judge Arrie W. Davis, a judge from the Court of Special Appeals.
Two judges -- Howard S. Chasanow and Irma S. Raker -- recused themselves from the case.
In April, Mr. Bereano received five years of probation, six months in a halfway house and a $20,000 fine.