Affirmative action will end
In the March 18 edition you called attention to letters from two readers who were alarmed by the opposition to affirmative action policies.
Neither letter offered suggestions as to how the issue could be resolved. They simply defended the programs.
There can be little doubt that a large majority of American citizens is deeply offended by the laws and policies which are called "affirmative action."
The fact that the cultural elite is determined to impose its ideas only serves to increase the sense of outrage experienced by ordinary citizens.
But since we live in a representative democracy, the political establishment is slowly but inexorably shifting its position. Affirmative action, as a government policy, is coming to an end. The only question is whether it will end gracefully.
The cultural elite has made a strategic error in trying to intimidate the opposition.
By attacking thoughtful people with cries of racism, it largely succeeded in silencing for a long time any open opposition, but by avoiding full debate of affirmative action policies, it surely increased the intensity of that opposition.
It seems to me that it would be helpful if The Baltimore Sun would encourage a full range of debate instead of drawing a box around two letters from supporters of "affirmative action" laws.
Concerning our new governor's idea of increasing the speed limit on rural roads to 65 mph, we all know that speed kills.
If you were to ask 10 drivers how they drive on rural roads, at least 80 percent would say they go at least five to 10 mph over the limit. A 65 mph limit would bring us real speeds of 70 or 75 mph.
It is a miracle that with the number of vehicles on the road the number of lives lost is relatively small.
We also should get into the habit of using our headlights whenever we turn on our windshield wipers and using turn signals when we change lanes.
William C. Gunning
Color of love
My compliments to The Evening Sun for your article on interracial adoption ("One family's struggle to be together," March 12).
The need for qualified adoptive parents is great. The ideal would be to place children and parents of like race together.
Since this is not always possible, the primary issue should be the children's needs.
Ms. Morin seems to be a qualified adoptive parent. To remove the three children from her care because they are black and she is white is ludicrous. The children are obviously blossoming with Ms. Morin.
The oldest has a pet to play with, the middle one, when not studying gymnastics, can be found playing computer games, and the youngest is a typical four-year-old.
The birth mother left a will requesting that Ms. Morin adopt the three children. The mother had no fears that her children would lose their connection to their heritage if they lived with Ms. Morin. She knew Ms. Morin to be a trustworthy friend and one who genuinely cared for the children.
It is important for children to be exposed to their culture and heritage, but is it fair to deny children a better way of life just so they can live in the same household with people of like race?
The most important concern is the happiness and welfare of the children. If these concerns can be achieved through interracial adoption, then let it be so.
Happy in Hollins
I came to the Hollins Market area of Baltimore 16 years ago as a college senior. I had never lived in the inner city before, and it was not my intention to stay after graduation, but somehow I just never left.
When I first moved here I felt very uneasy. It was so different from the quiet suburbs where I grew up.
I expected little from a neighborhood that was economically and culturally depressed. Yet I was overwhelmed by the sincerity, generosity and basic kindness of the people who lived here.
The Hollins Market area is proof that you don't need a lot of money to own your house and still live in a friendly, interesting neighborhood. Most people can buy a house here without a mortgage, and property taxes are still low.
I have a 15-minute walk to work, which gives me more time to spend with my family. The neighborhood has good, reasonably priced restaurants, bars, a coffeehouse, grocery stores, the Hollins Market and shops.
There is also a growing artists' community, which is involved with the SoWeBo festival and features art exhibits the first Sunday of every month in local galleries.
I enjoy the diversity of the people living in the city. I want my children to learn that it's all right to be different, and I want them to have compassion for people who are not as fortunate as they.
I enjoy sitting on the front steps gossiping with neighbors or just watching people walk by. I am committed to staying in the city and determined not to flee, as so many others have.
We can no longer run away from the problems of the inner city because eventually there will be no place to run to.
Humans are social by nature, and city neighborhoods are made for people to live, play and interact in. I intend to do just that for many years to come.
Elizabeth O'Connor Waters
The GOP's agenda is class warfare
Why are Americans so reluctant to recognize that there is a class war being waged in Congress?
Nearly everything Congress has enacted so far is clearly designed to enrich the rich and emasculate the poor.
The House has been very effective in reducing or eliminating funding for many programs that assist poor and middle-income people in their daily struggle for survival.
Congress is waging war especially on the poor, children, the infirm and the elderly.
Those who can't see this probably justify what is happening as necessary to teach discipline to those incapable of imposing it upon themselves.
Others, who are more honest, recognize it is the only way to pay for their own tax cuts as members of the higher-income bracket.
The Republicans, with Democrats' submissive support, are succeeding in returning America to the laissez-faire economics we attempted to do away with at the turn of the century.
Eliminating so many federal regulations and regulatory agencies will revive Upton Sinclair's "Jungle."
Regarding term limits, many uninformed people think this is the way to bring citizen legislators back into vogue. But term limits is just another strategy in the campaign to wage warfare between the classes.
The only successful attempt to impose term limits was on the presidency. Then as now, a Republican Congress wanted to overturn the social programs enacted by a Democratic president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Are American voters too stupid to see the parallel? Bill Clinton is no FDR, but the battle between wealth and power and the most vulnerable among us is a recurrent one. Term limits will result in a Congress dominated by the extremely wealthy.
Who in 1995 America can give up their profession for six to 12 years in order to serve in Congress and expect to return to the job they left?
If politicians are beholden to special interests now, just wait to see the explosion of sweetheart deals for corporations from term-limited representatives.
For their own economic survival, members of Congress will have to be "friendly" and supportive to their prospective future employers.
Term limits will guarantee blatant corporate sponsorship of all legislation. Middle America will suffer.
The streets have been relatively quiet in recent summers. Eliminate summer jobs and we'll have hundreds of thousands of youths looking for ways to vent their frustration.
Eliminate college financial aid and you'll have the middle class reacting as they did when they started seeing their own children coming back from Vietnam in body bags.
The class war that FDR was so successful in preventing is about to be reignited by those who think Big Bird is a communist and that feminists are out to destroy the fabric of the American family.
Myles B. Hoenig