Japanese also know how to loaf on job
A few months ago, a couple of Japanese politicians and bigwigs charged, in a spirited display of Yankee-bashing, that American workers are "lazy." We shouldn't take that feckless "lazy" charge lying down, so to speak. Such an indictment merits a counterattack.
Although the average Japanese worker spends 2,100 hours on the job annually, as compared with 1,900 hours for the average American, it should be pointed out that quite a bit of resting on the job by white-collar workers is an old tradition in Japan.
One of the most popular words over there is uchiawase, literally meaning an "appointment," and they have more "appointments" daily than you can shake a stick at.
Used when the urge to loaf strikes, the word is vague and broad enough to cover anything from reading newspapers to taking in a movie or the Japanese equivalent to the American's need for attending his grandmother's funeral on the opening day of the ball season.
Another leading Japanese politico referred to our good old Emersonian credo, that immortal one we all know and love, which holds that building better mousetraps gets paths beaten to doors. But he concluded with this eyebrow-raiser: "We now feel that the U.S. is no longer turning out mousetraps which are better than ours."
Now it's bad enough to be told that our workers over here enjoy too many personal energy crises on the job ("lazy," that is). But to be told further that we can't even make a better mousetrap than they do over there is too much. It's enough to make the ambitious, gung-ho Yankee worker break into sobs, or at least a bone-cracking yawn.
We must build
I do not think we will ever reach racial harmony unless all of us make a special effort to achieve it. Remember those famous words, "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what can you do for your country."
We came from different nationalities, it's true, and we are different, but we are all Americans now and we must cooperate together. That does not mean that we have to give up those things we like from our ethnic cultures, such as music, art and food, but if we continue as we are with each race trying to dominate the other, we will all fail -- and if we fail, so does our country. Remember these words, "A house divided against itself cannot stand."
Now that we have the Inner Harbor and a new stadium to bring in money for Baltimore, which we badly need to exist and to feed the poor, who will come here if there is continued violence?
I do not think the Rev. Martin Luther King wanted people to destroy their cities by fire. We cannot achieve success by burning down. We must build up.
Waste disposal demands regional view
Allow me to commend you on your lead editorial in The Evening Sun (May 11), "Trash Crisis vs. Cooperation."
You have hit the nail right on the head. Your synopsis of the potential trash crisis pending in the Baltimore region was extremely appropriate.
Regionalism is an important consideration in the managing of municipal solid waste. You are correct in pointing out that regionalism has often fared quite badly in the Baltimore area.
While you point out that the city and counties are driven by the same motives with regard to landfills everywhere quickly reaching their capacities, it should also be pointed out that Baltimore City bears more than its share of this burden in that both of the region's mass burn municipal solid waste incineration facilities are located within Baltimore City limits and Baltimore City takes all of the ash from these facilities at its landfill.
As City Council President Mary Pat Clarke has tried to point out on more than one occasion, regionalism does not mean that Baltimore City takes all of the region's trash with no assistance from its neighboring counties.
You do correctly point out that a success or disaster in one of the local jurisdictions is going to affect the other jurisdictions. For that reason, regional cooperation makes sense. It is imperative that decisions be reached in the near future with regard to the future status of the region's local landfills and what we are going to do about future landfill capacity. It is also imperative that this cooperation take place at the executive level.
Both Baltimore City and Baltimore County are presently working on their solid waste management plans for the next 10 years. Cooperation between the two jurisdictions with regard to this is imperative.
The writer is chairman of the Mayor's Commission on Recycling and Resource Conservation
Times have changed
Nine years ago I wrote a letter to the editor extolling Baltimore county schools.
I wrote about the wide variety of course offerings we had. I stated that if I lived in Baltimore City I might send my children to private schools as my parents had sent me. But I concluded by saying that "as a parent who wants the best for my children, I am sending them to Baltimore County public schools. I know they will get an excellent education." Times have changed.
This year at Franklin High School we had to drop science lab periods in order to offer the courses students wanted and needed with the staff that was provided. The two science teachers who are retiring this year will not be replaced.
As a result we are dropping the following courses in science: advanced physics, advanced biology, field biology, one of the four environmental science classes, one of the two human anatomy classes and one of the three honors chemistry classes.
Additionally we will have many physical science classes and biology classes with more than 30 students in them. All this is at a time when few question the need for more scientists, engineers and science literacy.
Similar things are happening in the other departments at Franklin and at all Baltimore County high schools. Some are losing as many as nine faculty members while losing no student enrollment. In addition, there will probably be reductions in the areas of guidance and assistant principals. So the same number of students will be squeezed into fewer classes with less office support for the over-stressed students and teachers.
In 1983 I stated that I felt our faculty was superior. I still feel that way. But their morale is very low. Their pay is being cut through furlough days and now even longevity increments are threatened.
They are being asked to teach more students with less support. They are not able to offer the courses the students want and need. They see the buildings falling apart around them. They see politicians who do not understand the needs of the schools. To try to bring about change, they have supported a "work to rule" job action.
This is not what they want and it hurts them. These are giving, caring, dedicated people. In the past they have volunteered for countless student related activities, including teaching an extra class or an independent study student who couldn't get a course scheduled. But they feel the need to bring the deterioration of the school system to the attention of the public.
Schools are not being supported in the way they need to be. These children are our future. Their education is important to our economy and our community -- in Reisterstown, Baltimore County and the nation.
To cut back on education is short-sighted. It will cost us in the future. We who work in the Baltimore County schools will continue to do the best we can with the resources that are provided.
And I can only hope that as a community and as a nation we can wake up sooner rather than later to the need for well-supported public education. But the downward trend is readily evident and it will be difficult to reverse.
I haven't given up hope for a better future for our schools, but my optimism is being tested.
John R. Lorenz
The writer is chairperson of science at Franklin High school.
Perhaps I shouldn't have been surprised that The Evening Sun, which encourages readers to spend a dollar a minute to hear astrological drivel over the phone, chose to print an article on child-rearing-by-the-planets.
What's next -- care of the elderly by Tarot card?
Larry D. Rosen