SUBSCRIBE

ROUTE 100 DELAY MEANS TENUOUS FUTURE FOR OFFICE PARK

THE BALTIMORE SUN

It is a rare pastoral scene in Ellicott City: clumps of woods separated by meadows, Holsteins grazing near a creek.

Amid this isolatedsetting is what exists so far of an ambitious office park project: five one-story office buildings and a bank line up behind a stand of trees next to the park's only access road. A squat building housing a child care center is nearby.

On the undeveloped far corner of the park, a large metal "ROAD CLOSED" sign marks the end of a half-mile stretch of gravel-strewn blacktop called Route 100. For now, it goes nowhere, representing years of negotiation, millions of dollars in investments, and disappointment for county developers.

The developer of that secluded property, Patrick McCuan, is one of several people who invested in the Route 100 project, either by agreeing to pay for parts of the road -- as McCuan did -- or by donating or trading land to the state -- deals made to avoid buying the land using the state's costly and complicated condemnation procedure.

But with the Route 100 project postponed indefinitely, these developers now wonder when the road will be built and how much the delay will affect their projects and cost them in property taxes, loan payments and lost business.

McCuan, who is sinking $3 million into his one-mile portion next to the Columbia 100 Office Research Park, stopped his construction crews last fall, leaving a half-mile of the road unpaved.

That was when the state Department ofTransportation, citing unexpected drops in vehicle title taxes, stopped work on the rest of Route 100 between I-95 in Jessup and Route 29in Ellicott City.

While McCuan downplays the road's effect on thedevelopment of his property, others in the commercial real estate community say it is in a vulnerable area without the access the highwaywould provide.

For McCuan and three other developers, that accesswas among their projects' main selling points.

Lack of access is likely to compound McCuan's mounting financial troubles, which led toa court order Monday tying up his interest in 14 development partnerships and associations to pay back more than $11 million in loans. (See accompanying story.)

McCuan would not say whether there was a link between his expenditures on Route 100 and his financial problems and said his attorneys had advised him not to comment on the case.

Another development linked to Route 100 is the 55-acre 103/29 Limited Partnership, bordered by Route 29, Route 100, Montgomery Road and Long Gate Parkway.

Developer Robert Moxley said he expects the Route 100 delays to cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost revenue, taxes and interest on the property if one part of the road project, the intersection of Route 100 and Route 29, is delayed for even a year.

He said he had planned to begin design this year of an integrated residential, commercial and office complex, but has put the project on hold until the State Highway Administration signs contractsfor construction of the planned interchange.

Plans called for Moxley's project to be built along with the intersection, which SHA officials say would take two or three years to complete after $24.3 million becomes available.

Construction of the residential, commercial and office segments were supposed to dovetail, but Moxley said the delay may force him to build the residential and commercial sections piecemeal, to cover carrying costs.

Without Route 100, those portions will have to use existing access to Montgomery Road and its heavilycongested intersection at Route 29.

On one side of the property is a part of the Route 100 project that will go ahead with or without the SHA.

Moxley and his cousin, James Moxley Jr., through several partnerships and the Security Development Corp., have agreed to buildLong Gate Parkway, a six-lane connector that will serve as access toRoute 100 and Route 29 for south Ellicott City, and trade parcels oftheir land for unused SHA right-of-way.

James Moxley said architects last week began working on designs for the road, which he estimates will cost between $300,000 and $400,000.

"We're going to build it and be done with it," he said, adding that it could be completed this year.

McCuan, of McCuan Development Group, said that were it not for the SHA reneging on its commitment to connect Route 100 to hisproperty, his one-mile, two-lane portion of the road could have beencompleted by July.

He says although the seven office buildings hehad planned to develop this year were put on hold because of the sagging office market, he had hoped the Route 100 interchange at Route 29 and the road connecting to his segment -- which would dramatically improve access to the park -- would be built by the time the market rebounds.

About 50 acres of the 108-acre park are left to be sold to other developers.

McCuan blames former County Executive M. Elizabeth Bobo for delaying the road work and costing county residents about $2 million in taxes that businesses occupying the offices would bepaying.

He would not elaborate, but the highway's recent history has been marked by opposition from communities near the planned highway, such as Timber Run, Valley View and Hunt Country Estates.

As executive, Bobo lobbied for state money for the highway. But in the late 1970s, before she attained elective office, Bobo also lobbied to keep part of the project out of her Columbia Hills neighborhood.

"The thing that makes me sad is that when we are in desperate need of revenue, local politics have caused us to lose millions of dollars in tax revenues," McCuan said.

"It has an impact on every citizen inHoward County, let alone the people who have to wait at that light at Route 103 (and Route 29) every day."

Right now, McCuan said he has confidence that the SHA will get the project under way within a year.

"They made a blanket statement that they're delaying every newproject. This may not be deemed a new project because the bids have been received," McCuan said.

That runs counter to SHA's gloomy forecast of an indefinite delay until the legislature comes up with financing, most likely through increased Motor Vehicle Administration fees or gas taxes.

"Route 100 right now is out of the question," saidSteve Zentz, state deputy transportation secretary.

Legislative efforts to raise money by increasing MVA fees and gas taxes failed this year, and state revenue continued to fall this month.

"Until we get a revenue increase or until the economy turns around and revenues increase dramatically, such that it exceeded our wildest expectations, there's no shot that we're going to do Route 100," said Zentz.

The project's delay doesn't seem to bother John Liparini, president of Brantley Development. His company exchanged land from its Brightfield Development for unused SHA right-of-way to help make Route 100 possible.

Across Meadowridge Road from Brightfield, Brantley owns Center 9500, planned to comprise 360 houses, a golf course and about 1 million square feet of office space.

"It's hard to tell right now"whether the delay will affect the project, Liparini said. "We're noton a very fast track with the office development," which he said wasthe only part of the development that could be affected by a Route 100 delay.

"The early phases (of development) could occur in the next three or four years . . . The timing could be in line with the development of Route 100."

SHA officials said building Route 100 fromRoute 29 to I-95 will probably take about five years from the time the $67 million needed for it becomes available.

"I don't think that there's any real impact on us as far as our planning is concerned,"Liparini said.

He added, however, that he thought the real problem was up the road, between Route 29 and I-95.

"I'd hate to have a project that was sitting right in the middle," where access is more of a problem, he said.

Another developer who worked with the SHA toprovide land for the highway was Macks and Macks of Baltimore, whichdonated land in exchange for an alignment shift.

The shift prevented the road from cutting through the middle of the Village of Montgomery Run, a 588-unit condominium development on about 80 acres.

"It was just so far in front of us it just wasn't an issue," said Lawrence Macks, who said the development should be finished within a year.All but 50 or 60 of the condominiums have been sold, he said.

Copyright © 2021, The Baltimore Sun, a Baltimore Sun Media Group publication | Place an Ad

You've reached your monthly free article limit.

Get Unlimited Digital Access

4 weeks for only 99¢
Subscribe Now

Cancel Anytime

Already have digital access? Log in

Log out

Print subscriber? Activate digital access