Manning testifies: 'I'm sorry that I hurt the United States'

Army Pfc. Bradley E. Manning, speaking for the first time since he was charged with espionage for leaking thousands of military and diplomatic documents, apologized that his actions hurt the United States and told a judge Wednesday that he was "dealing with a lot of issues" at the time.

Facing Army Col. Denise Lind — who is hearing the case without a jury — and reading from a statement he held in his hands, Manning spoke for three minutes. He said he understood what he was doing at the time but did not fully appreciate the consequences.


"I'm sorry that my actions hurt people. I'm sorry that I hurt the United States," Manning said in an unsworn statement, which meant he spoke from the witness stand but did not face cross-examination from prosecutors. "At the time of my decisions ... I was dealing with a lot of issues."

Manning, 25, could be sentenced to up to 90 years in prison for leaking 700,000 war logs and diplomatic cables as well as battlefield video footage to the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks. He was convicted last month of espionage, theft and disobeying regulations. Lind has been hearing arguments in the sentencing portion of the case for nearly two weeks.


During the prosecution's presentation, the general who led the Pentagon's review of the case testified that publication of the documents revealed tactics, strained relations with allies and caused some Afghans to stop cooperating with Americans. Another expert testified that the release of the documents helped al-Qaida's recruiting efforts.

The defense wrapped up its case on sentencing Wednesday. The court-martial reconvenes Friday, when the government will decide whether to offer rebuttal witnesses.

For months, Manning has remained silent as he sat in uniform next to his defense attorneys at the court-martial, which is taking place at Fort Meade in Anne Arundel County. The former Marylander last spoke publicly during a pre-trial hearing in February, during which he read a 10,000 word statement for roughly an hour.

On Wednesday, Manning's statement was shorter and more contrite.

"When I made these decisions I believed it was going to help people, not hurt people," Manning said. "In retrospect, I should have worked more aggressively inside the system. ... I have flaws and issues that I have to deal with, but I know that I can and will be a better person."

Manning's statement followed more expansive testimony Wednesday from his sister and aunt, who described a dysfunctional home in which the former junior analyst was raised.

Manning stayed with his aunt, Debra Van Alstyne, who lives in Potomac, before he enlisted in the Army in 2007.

Speaking through tears, Manning's sister, Casey Major, testified about having grown up in a house where their parents were too drunk to care for their children. When Manning's father tried to leave, his mother attempted suicide and spent a week in a psychiatric ward, Major said.


"Who took care of your brother when he was a baby?" asked defense attorney David Coombs.

"My mom, but mostly me if she couldn't," Major replied. "If he cried in the middle of the night, I would get up and make a bottle or change his diaper."

"Why were you having to do that?" Coombs asked.

"My mom wouldn't get up," Major said. "If I was home, I would take care of him."

Coombs then displayed pictures of Manning in childhood, including one in which he sat on a swing at his boyhood home in Oklahoma and another that showed him sitting at a computer. Major described each of the pictures for the court.

Coombs asked Major what she hoped for her brother's future.


"I just hope he can be who he wants to be. I hope he can just be happy," she said.

The Army's lawyers did not cross-examine Major.

The defense used Wednesday's testimony to try to connect Manning's childhood to the mental health issues he confronted later. Manning's attorney said the Army should have recognized those problems before it deployed him to Iraq.

Capt. Michael Worsley, Manning's Army psychologist, testified that he initially diagnosed him with a personality disorder in early 2010. Worsley said Manning, who is gay, struggled to connect with peers and lacked a support structure in the Army and at home.

Worsley said Manning opened up to him after an incident in May 2010 in which the former junior analyst struck a fellow soldier. Based on those conversations, Worsley diagnosed a gender identity disorder and unit officials began to consider Manning's deployment.

About that time, Manning was arrested for leaking the documents.


"Being in the military and having a gender identity issue does not exactly go hand in hand," Worsley said. "At that time, the military was not exactly friendly toward the gay community or anybody who held views as such."

Attorneys for the government argued that Manning had other outlets to discuss his feelings — military chaplains, for instance — and that for most of their therapy sessions Worsley did not note behavior that would have raised questions about Manning's fitness to serve.

For all but one session, Manning met with Worsley voluntarily.

Navy Capt. David Moulton, a forensic psychiatrist who reviewed the case after Manning's arrest, said that an individual questioning his gender identity can face trouble with judgment in other areas of his life as well.

Moulton said Manning was under "severe emotional stress" at the time he released the documents and that it impaired his ability to understand the consequences of his decisions.

"It can be quite impairing," Moulton said. "Gender is very much at the core of our identity as individuals, and when that is off keel — to use a Navy kind of term — the whole ship of your life has difficultly establishing direction and tends to wander."


Manning, an Oklahoma native, studied at Montgomery College in Maryland before he enlisted. He has been detained since 2010, when he was arrested in Baghdad.

To some, Manning is a whistle-blower whose release of video footage of a U.S. helicopter crew killing civilians in Baghdad revealed evidence of a war crime. To others, he is a traitor whose release of classified materials endangered American lives.

"He had a very hard start to his life," Van Alstyne said. "I think he just thought he was doing the right thing at a time when he really was not thinking clearly at all."