This website stores data such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as marketing, personalization, and analytics. By remaining on this website, you indicate your consent. Cookie Policy
Baltimore Sun
  • Subscriber Services(Opens in new window)
    • Subscribe here(Opens in new window)
    • Manage subscription(Opens in new window)
    • EZ Pay(Opens in new window)
    • Vacation Stop(Opens in new window)
    • Benefits of subscribing(Opens in new window)
    • Sun Insider
  • Read today's newspaper(Opens in new window)
    • Baltimore Sun(Opens in new window)
    • Evening Edition(Opens in new window)
    • Carroll County Times(Opens in new window)
    • Capital Gazette(Opens in new window)
    • The Aegis(Opens in new window)
    • Carroll Evening Edition(Opens in new window)
  • Advertise With Us(Opens in new window)
  • Latest
  • Maryland
    • Anne Arundel County
    • Baltimore City
    • Baltimore County
    • Carroll County
    • Harford County
    • Howard County
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Sun Investigates
    • Environment
  • Marijuana
  • Nation & World
  • Sports
    • Baltimore Orioles
    • Baltimore Ravens
    • College Sports
    • High School sports
    • Sports Analysis
    • Terps
    • Horse Racing
  • Business
    • Consumer Reviews
    • Autos(Opens in new window)
    • Real Estate
    • Top Workplaces 2022
    • Best Reviews(Opens in new window)
  • Politics
    • Elections
  • Health
    • Coronavirus
  • Entertainment
    • Movies
    • Arts
    • Music
    • Events(Opens in new window)
    • TV
    • TV Schedule
    • Horoscopes
    • Comics
  • Features
    • Newsmaker
    • Hot Properties
    • Home
    • Travel
    • Retro Baltimore
  • Food & Drink
  • Calendar
  • Fun & Games(Opens in new window)
    • Horoscopes(Opens in new window)
    • Jumble Daily(Opens in new window)
    • Daily Crossword(Opens in new window)
    • Solitaire(Opens in new window)
    • Bubble Shooter HD(Opens in new window)
  • Obituaries
    • Death Notices(Opens in new window)
    • Editorial Obituaries
    • Place a Notice(Opens in new window)
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Readers Respond
    • Op-ed
    • Columnists
    • Submit letter to the editor(Opens in new window)
    • Submit an op-ed(Opens in new window)
  • Weather
  • Photos
    • Picturing Maryland(Opens in new window)
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Awards
    • Special sections(Opens in new window)
    • 2023 interns(Opens in new window)
    • Mary J. Corey Internship(Opens in new window)
    • About our ads(Opens in new window)
    • RSS
  • Branded Content
    • Advertising by Ascend(Opens in new window)
    • Paid content by Brandpoint(Opens in new window)
    • Paid Partner Content(Opens in new window)
  • More(Opens in new window)
    • Archives(Opens in new window)
    • Reprints & Licensing(Opens in new window)
    • Classifieds
    • En español
    • Privacy Policy(Opens in new window)
    • Public Notices(Opens in new window)
    • TAG disclosure(Opens in new window)
    • Terms of Service(Opens in new window)
    • The Sun Store
<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 8.0/10 vs. 6.4/10<br/>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 90% vs. 66%<br/>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 83% vs. 49%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 8.0/10 vs. 6.4/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 90% vs. 66%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 83% vs. 49%

(Courtesy of Warner Bros.)

Movie remakes people like more than the original

Oct 20, 2023 at 10:20 am
Advertisement

Producing movie remakes is a reliable - if unoriginal - strategy for filmmakers. Most of the time, the reboots pale in comparison to the original film - but sometimes the remake exceeds the initial version in both critical acclaim and audience reception. Here are the 25 best movie remakes audiences liked more than the original

<p>Producing movie remakes is a reliable - if unoriginal - strategy for filmmakers. Most of the time, the reboots pale in comparison to the original film - but sometimes the remake exceeds the initial version in both critical acclaim and audience reception.<br></p><p>To determine the movie remakes that are better than the original, 24/7 Tempo developed an index using average ratings on <a href='https://www.imdb.com/'>IMDb</a>, an online movie database owned by Amazon, and both audience scores and Tomatometer scores on <a href='https://www.rottentomatoes.com/'>Rotten Tomatoes</a>, an online movie and TV review aggregator, as of mid September 2023, weighting all ratings equally. Remakes were ranked based on the difference between their index score and that of the original film they were based upon.<br></p><p>There are myriad reasons why producers or directors may revisit a movie: They can tap into audiences who know the previous version, counting on the appeal of the earlier movie to help generate interest in the remake, and will also likely gain new viewers along the way. Reboots enable filmgoers to relive their original film experience while offering a refreshing approach to the original material. (Sometimes movie aficionados actively demand reboots featuring their favorite characters.) In addition, technology can expand upon the original film. (<a href='https://247wallst.com/special-report/2022/05/26/best-movie-remakes-of-all-time/?utm_source=tribune&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=tribune&utm_content=best-movie-remakes-of-all-time&utm_term=813217031&wsrlui=813217031'>Here’s a list of the best movie remakes of all time</a>.)<br></p><p>Technology tends to be a major factor behind the reboots of science fiction and horror films. John Carpenter and David Cronenberg took two of the most famous sci-fi films of the 1950s, “The Thing” (1951) and “The Fly” (1958), and built on their terrifying effects with technological advancements in the 1980s.<br></p><p>Some remakes look abroad for inspiration, reworking popular foreign-language films to reach a wider American audience – for instance the Israeli thriller “Ha-Hov,” reinterpreted as “The Debt,” or Iceland’s “Á annan veg” (or “Either Way”), transported from the Icelandic countryside to rural Texas as “Prince Avalanche.” (<a href='https://247wallst.com/special-report/2023/09/18/top-american-adaptations-of-foreign-movies/?utm_source=tribune&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=tribune&utm_content=top-american-adaptations-of-foreign-movies&utm_term=813217032&wsrlui=813217032'>See this list of the top American adaptations of foreign movies</a>.)<br></p><p>While some reboots have been released as many as 60 years after the original (like “West Side Story”), five of the films on this list were remade within four years of the original. Eighteen of the 25 remakes on our list were released in the 21st century, demonstrating that Hollywood has hardly tired of its remake strategy - and might even be learning to do things a little better sometimes.</p>

Producing movie remakes is a reliable - if unoriginal - strategy for filmmakers. Most of the time, the reboots pale in comparison to the original film - but sometimes the remake exceeds the initial version in both critical acclaim and audience reception.

To determine the movie remakes that are better than the original, 24/7 Tempo developed an index using average ratings on IMDb, an online movie database owned by Amazon, and both audience scores and Tomatometer scores on Rotten Tomatoes, an online movie and TV review aggregator, as of mid September 2023, weighting all ratings equally. Remakes were ranked based on the difference between their index score and that of the original film they were based upon.

There are myriad reasons why producers or directors may revisit a movie: They can tap into audiences who know the previous version, counting on the appeal of the earlier movie to help generate interest in the remake, and will also likely gain new viewers along the way. Reboots enable filmgoers to relive their original film experience while offering a refreshing approach to the original material. (Sometimes movie aficionados actively demand reboots featuring their favorite characters.) In addition, technology can expand upon the original film. (Here’s a list of the best movie remakes of all time.)

Technology tends to be a major factor behind the reboots of science fiction and horror films. John Carpenter and David Cronenberg took two of the most famous sci-fi films of the 1950s, “The Thing” (1951) and “The Fly” (1958), and built on their terrifying effects with technological advancements in the 1980s.

Some remakes look abroad for inspiration, reworking popular foreign-language films to reach a wider American audience – for instance the Israeli thriller “Ha-Hov,” reinterpreted as “The Debt,” or Iceland’s “Á annan veg” (or “Either Way”), transported from the Icelandic countryside to rural Texas as “Prince Avalanche.” (See this list of the top American adaptations of foreign movies.)

While some reboots have been released as many as 60 years after the original (like “West Side Story”), five of the films on this list were remade within four years of the original. Eighteen of the 25 remakes on our list were released in the 21st century, demonstrating that Hollywood has hardly tired of its remake strategy - and might even be learning to do things a little better sometimes.

(Courtesy of Warner Bros.)

Advertisement

25. 3:10 to Yuma (2007) vs. 3:10 to Yuma (1957)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 7.7/10 vs. 7.6/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 86% vs. 79%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 89% vs. 96%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 7.7/10 vs. 7.6/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 86% vs. 79%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 89% vs. 96%

(Courtesy of Lionsgate)

Advertisement

24. The Mechanic (2011) vs. The Mechanic (1972)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 6.6/10 vs. 6.9/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 51% vs. 65%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 53% vs. 33%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 6.6/10 vs. 6.9/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 51% vs. 65%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 53% vs. 33%

(Courtesy of CBS Films)

Advertisement

23. Prince Avalanche (2013) vs. Either Way (2011)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 6.4/10 vs. 6.6/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 53% vs. 65%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 82% vs. 65%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 6.4/10 vs. 6.6/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 53% vs. 65%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 82% vs. 65%

(Courtesy of Magnolia Pictures)

Advertisement

22. The Debt (2010) vs. Ha-Hov (2007)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 6.8/10 vs. 6.9/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 66% vs. 69%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 77% vs. 69%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 6.8/10 vs. 6.9/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 66% vs. 69%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 77% vs. 69%

(Courtesy of Focus Features)

Advertisement

21. West Side Story (2021) vs. West Side Story (1961)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 7.2/10 vs. 7.5/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 93% vs. 84%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 91% vs. 91%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 7.2/10 vs. 7.5/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 93% vs. 84%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 91% vs. 91%

(Courtesy of Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures)

Advertisement

20. Wrong Turn (2021) vs. Wrong Turn (2003)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 5.5/10 vs. 6.1/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 46% vs. 54%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 65% vs. 40%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 5.5/10 vs. 6.1/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 46% vs. 54%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 65% vs. 40%

(Courtesy of Blue Swan Entertainment)

Advertisement

19. Fever Pitch (2005) vs. Fever Pitch (1997)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 6.2/10 vs. 6.7/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 60% vs. 59%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 65% vs. 50%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 6.2/10 vs. 6.7/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 60% vs. 59%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 65% vs. 50%

(Courtesy of Twentieth Century Fox)

Advertisement

18. The Fly (1986) vs. The Fly (1958)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 7.6/10 vs. 7.1/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 83% vs. 71%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 93% vs. 95%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 7.6/10 vs. 7.1/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 83% vs. 71%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 93% vs. 95%

(Courtesy of Twentieth Century Fox)

Advertisement

17. Freaky Friday (2003) vs. Freaky Friday (1976)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 6.2/10 vs. 6.3/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 57% vs. 57%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 88% vs. 70%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 6.2/10 vs. 6.3/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 57% vs. 57%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 88% vs. 70%

(Courtesy of Buena Vista Pictures)

Advertisement

16. We Are What We Are (2013) vs. We Are What We Are (2010)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 5.9/10 vs. 5.7/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 50% vs. 48%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 86% vs. 72%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 5.9/10 vs. 5.7/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 50% vs. 48%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 86% vs. 72%

(Courtesy of Entertainment One)

Advertisement

15. Willard (2003) vs. Willard (1971)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 6.1/10 vs. 6.2/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 51% vs. 38%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 64% vs. 57%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 6.1/10 vs. 6.2/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 51% vs. 38%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 64% vs. 57%

(Courtesy of New Line Cinema)

Advertisement

14. The Crazies (2010) vs. The Crazies (1973)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 6.5/10 vs. 6.1/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 56% vs. 43%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 70% vs. 69%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 6.5/10 vs. 6.1/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 56% vs. 43%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 70% vs. 69%

(Courtesy of Overture Films)

Advertisement

13. Scent of a Woman (1992) vs. Scent of a Woman (1974)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 8.0/10 vs. 7.6/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 92% vs. 83%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 89% vs. 83%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 8.0/10 vs. 7.6/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 92% vs. 83%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 89% vs. 83%

(Courtesy of Universal Pictures)

Advertisement

12. Lassie (2005) vs. Lassie (1994)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 6.7/10 vs. 5.9/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 64% vs. 55%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 93% vs. 88%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 6.7/10 vs. 5.9/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 64% vs. 55%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 93% vs. 88%

(Courtesy of Anderson Digital)

Advertisement

11. Little Shop of Horrors (1986) vs. The Little Shop of Horrors (1960)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 7.0/10 vs. 6.3/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 79% vs. 55%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 90% vs. 92%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 7.0/10 vs. 6.3/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 79% vs. 55%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 90% vs. 92%

(Courtesy of Warner Bros.)

Advertisement

10. The Thing (1982) vs. The Thing from Another World (1951)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 8.1/10 vs. 7.1/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 92% vs. 73%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 86% vs. 86%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 8.1/10 vs. 7.1/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 92% vs. 73%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 86% vs. 86%

(Courtesy of Universal Pictures)

Advertisement

9. True Lies (1994) vs. La Totale! (1991)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 7.2/10 vs. 6.3/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 76% vs. 63%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 71% vs. 63%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 7.2/10 vs. 6.3/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 76% vs. 63%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 71% vs. 63%

(Courtesy of Twentieth Century Fox)

Advertisement

8. CODA (2021) vs. The Bélier Family (2014)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 8.0/10 vs. 7.3/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 91% vs. 75%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 94% vs. 83%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 8.0/10 vs. 7.3/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 91% vs. 75%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 94% vs. 83%

(Courtesy of Apple TV+)

Advertisement

7. The Kindergarten Teacher (2018) vs. The Kindergarten Teacher (2014)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 6.7/10 vs. 6.6/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 68% vs. 45%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 90% vs. 77%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 6.7/10 vs. 6.6/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 68% vs. 45%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 90% vs. 77%

(Courtesy of Netflix)

Advertisement

6. The Departed (2006) vs. Internal Affairs (2002)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 8.5/10 vs. 8.0/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 94% vs. 59%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 90% vs. 88%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 8.5/10 vs. 8.0/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 94% vs. 59%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 90% vs. 88%

(Courtesy of Warner Bros.)

Advertisement

5. Pete's Dragon (2016) vs. Pete's Dragon (1977)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 6.7/10 vs. 6.4/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 72% vs. 60%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 88% vs. 56%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 6.7/10 vs. 6.4/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 72% vs. 60%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 88% vs. 56%

(Courtesy of Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures)

Advertisement

4. Ocean's Eleven (2001) vs. Ocean's 11 (1960)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 7.7/10 vs. 6.6/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 80% vs. 81%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 83% vs. 48%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 7.7/10 vs. 6.6/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 80% vs. 81%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 83% vs. 48%

(Courtesy of Warner Bros.)

Advertisement

3. Return to Paradise (1998) vs. Force majeure (1989)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 6.9/10 vs. 6.3/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 74% vs. 50%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 71% vs. 50%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 6.9/10 vs. 6.3/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 74% vs. 50%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 71% vs. 50%

(Courtesy of PolyGram Video)

Advertisement

2. Dune (2021) vs. Dune (1984)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 8.0/10 vs. 6.4/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 90% vs. 66%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 83% vs. 49%</p>

> IMDb user rating: 8.0/10 vs. 6.4/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 90% vs. 66%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 83% vs. 49%

(Courtesy of Warner Bros.)

Advertisement

1. The Maltese Falcon (1941) vs. The Maltese Falcon (1931)

<p><strong>> IMDb user rating:</strong> 8.0/10 vs. 6.9/10<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes audience score:</strong> 91% vs. 49%<br>
<strong>> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score:</strong> 99% vs. 71%<br></p><p><strong><a style='color: #008000' href='https://247wallst.com/special-report/2022/05/26/best-movie-remakes-of-all-time/?utm_source=tribune&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=tribune&utm_content=best-movie-remakes-of-all-time&utm_term=813217033&wsrlui=813217033'>ALSO READ: Best Movie Remakes of All Time</a></strong></p>

> IMDb user rating: 8.0/10 vs. 6.9/10
> Rotten Tomatoes audience score: 91% vs. 49%
> Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer score: 99% vs. 71%

ALSO READ: Best Movie Remakes of All Time

(Courtesy of Warner Bros.)

Oct 20, 2023 at 12:20 pm
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement
LATEST
Weather

Snow falls in Maryland, predicted in Baltimore area Tuesday

6m
Snow falls in Maryland, predicted in Baltimore area Tuesday

Dan Rodricks

Dan Rodricks: Murder convictions up, homicides down in Bates’ first year as Baltimore state’s attorney | STAFF COMMENTARY

20m
Dan Rodricks: Murder convictions up, homicides down in Bates’ first year as Baltimore state’s attorney | STAFF COMMENTARY

Nation & World

Jimmy Carter set to lead presidents, first ladies in mourning and celebrating Rosalynn Carter

1h
Jimmy Carter set to lead presidents, first ladies in mourning and celebrating Rosalynn Carter
Footer Logo

CONNECT

TRIBUNE PUBLISHING

      COMPANY INFO

      • Cookie Preferences

        Copyright © 2023, Baltimore Sun