The planned Exelon Corp. building at Harbor Point now calls for 103 apartments — 116,000 square feet of residential space — where office space was originally planned, Beatty Development Group representatives told the Baltimore City Urban Design and Architectural Review Panel Thursday.
But the review board, questioning whether the new plans would render its earlier approval of the project "null and void," refused to grant revised final approval and urged Beatty Development Group to make further design revisions, including to the lobby.
"We'd like you to come back," panel member Gary Bowden said.
Although apartments have always been part of Beatty's plans, they were not envisioned until Phases II or III, later in the development process. The newly announced studio and 1–bedroom apartments would be built in Phase I, said Jonathan Flesher, senior development director for Beatty Development Group.
Flesher said the apartments would replace roughly 116,000 square feet of office space and would be a more efficient use of the space.
Flesher said the change is being proposed to make the project more of a mixed-use development, and that it would help in marketing the building.
A trading floor and a parking garage are still part of the plans, but now it would be apartments wrapping around the garage instead of office space, he said. The design has been tweaked accordingly, he said, because without changes, many of the apartments would have had no windows.
Darrell Doan, managing director of real estate development for the Baltimore Development Corp., the city's quasi-public economic development arm, said after the hearing that the proposed change "increases the viability of the project."
But UDARP members said they had problems with some design aspects of the building, which they said were changed from the original concept.
In January, the energy giant, which acquired Baltimore-based Constellation Energy Group last year, won UDARP schematic approval for a brick-and-glass regional headquarters with a tower that would rise 23 stories and 350 feet as part of a $250 million first phase of Harbor Point development.
25th Street Station
In other action, panel members also held off on approving a final master plan for the planned 25th Street Station shopping center on 11 acres in Remington, and also balked at giving revised final approval for Wal-Mart's plans as anchor. UDARP recommended that the developer, WV Urban Development, come back before the panel, said Anthony Cataldo, UDARP coordinator.
WV Urban Development presented new plans, as expected, that no longer call for a building with an urban Wal-mart on top and a Lowe's on the bottom. Lowe's long ago pulled out of the project and the Wal-mart would grow about 10,000 square feet to about 104,000 square feet, taking over a garden center that was originally supposed to be part of Lowe's. A parking garage is no longer called for, and there now would be a surface parking lot with about 1,000 spaces, WV representatives told UDARP.
"So far, fine," said City Councilman Carl Stokes, who added that he wants to hear community comment in the coming weeks.
Members of the city review panel questioned the aesthetics of the project, saying that brick walls on either side of the Wal-mart entrance are overpowering and blank, and in need of landscaping or screening.
"There's a lot more that could be done," said Thomas Stosur, director of the Planning Department.
"There's kind of an amorphousness to this and a lack of street edge," said panelist David Haresign, an architect.
Judith Kunst, president of the Greater Remington Improvement Association, said she would post the revised plans on the website griaonline.org and that she, too, wants to wait for comments.
"I'm not sure," Kunst said when asked what she thinks of the downsized plans. "It's a big change. I think a lot of us were disappointed with Lowe's not coming."
But she added, "My community has a huge population that welcomes a Wal-mart."
Joan Floyd, president of the Remington Neighborhood Alliance, said the entrances and exits at the shopping center do not make the development pedestrian-friendly enough and represent "a missed opportunity."