Baltimore housing over the decade: less affordable, more likely to be fixed up
By Jamie Smith Hopkins
May 16, 2012 at 6:00 AM
Rough economy notwithstanding, more Baltimore homes were getting face lifts at the end of the last decade than the start.
That's one of the bits of intel from the newest Vital Signs, an ongoing effort by the Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance at the University of Baltimore to shine a light on how the city is changing. Statistics range from crime rates to employment rates. (City residents -- pick your neighborhood from the Vital Signs map, and you can see where things stand near you.)
That's way down from the peak in 2007 -- when 4.6 percent of homes were getting significant work done to them in a delayed reaction to the housing bubble -- but it's surprisingly neck-and-neck with the prime bubble years. About 2 percent of the city's housing stock was being rehabbed in 2004, and about 2.8 percent in 2005.
A common rule is thumb is to avoid paying more than 30 percent of your (pre-tax) income on housing. But 40 percent of homeowners with a mortgage were in that category in the last five years of the decade, up from 32 percent of homeowners in 2000.
And renters? More than half -- 53 percent -- were in the over-stressed category. That's up from 40 percent in 2000.
It might come as a surprise, but the share of city homes whose lenders were trying to foreclose was higher in 2000 than it was in either 2008 or 2010. Only 2009 topped the beginning of the decade, with foreclosure filings on 3 percent of homes compared with 2.5 percent in 2000.