xml:space="preserve">
xml:space="preserve">
Advertisement
Advertisement

U.S. officials brief inspectors on Iraq's weapons programs

WASHINGTON - U.S. officials briefed United Nations weapons inspectors yesterday on intelligence about Saddam Hussein's chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs, setting in motion what the Bush administration hopes will be an aggressive early test of Iraqi cooperation.

The briefing, by State Department and intelligence officials to the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission, offered the first significant transfer of intelligence under the Security Council's new inspections program, a senior administration official said.

President Bush and other administration officials expect Hussein to allow inspectors back into his country, even though his parliament defiantly rejected yesterday the inspection terms laid down in a U.N. Security Council resolution passed unanimously Friday.

UNMOVIC is responsible for ferreting out Iraq's chemical, biological and missile programs. A separate briefing is planned this week in Vienna for inspectors at the International Atomic Energy Agency, which will search for Iraq's nuclear programs.

The Security Council resolution calls for U.N. member countries to provide the inspectors with information about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. The heads of the two U.N. agencies, Hans Blix at UNMOVIC and Mohamed El Baradei at IAEA, have also asked the U.S. and other governments for intelligence help.

In complying, the Bush administration is also putting the inspectors on notice that it will be watching closely to see how the two agencies use the intelligence in designing their inspections programs and evaluating disclosures required of Iraq.

"We're going to push Blix very hard," the senior administration official said yesterday.

France and Britain also are expected to turn over intelligence they have collected on Iraq.

President Bush said yesterday the United States will have no patience with Iraqi delays, deception or attempts to negotiate how the inspections are to be conducted.

"It's over. We're through negotiations, there's no more time. The man must disarm," Bush said in a brief exchange with reporters, again threatening to lead a military coalition to rid Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction if Hussein failed to do it himself.

"This kind of deception and delay - all that is over with," Bush said. "There's a zero-tolerance policy now."

While Bush administration officials say they respect Blix's and El Baradei's toughness and professionalism, they are not sure how eager the two U.N. officials are to provoke a confrontation with Iraq that could hasten a U.S. invasion to topple Hussein's regime.

Sensitive targets

U.N. inspectors are expected to act on new information from the United States and other governments, but also plan to check on a number of sites that were inspected before Hussein barred inspectors from Iraq in 1998.

The administration wants UNMOVIC and IAEA, which have lists of more than 700 sites in Iraq, to concentrate initially on a few sensitive targets. "It's more a matter of a half-dozen where, if Blix is aggressive, he will bring it to a head quickly and expose Iraqi deception," the senior official said.

Officials with the Iraqi National Congress, an umbrella organization of exile groups opposed to Hussein, said it is important for the inspectors to immediately burrow into the government agencies used by the Iraqi dictator to conceal his weapons programs.

Among the most important is the Special Security Organization, the country's top intelligence agency, which is headed by Hussein's son Qusay.

Zaab Sethna, an adviser to the INC in London, said SSO records and logbooks, along with the deployment of vehicles and forces, would help pinpoint the movement and concealment of Iraq's chemical, biological and nuclear programs.

Sethna said the INC is in contact with two defectors from the SSO who have provided the U.S. government with more information about the organization's inner workings. "We have a complete organizational chart of senior officers," Sethna said. "We know the layout of their headquarters."

The United Nations' use of intelligence is a sensitive subject. Mindful that inspectors have been accused in the past of spying for the United States, Blix has said the supply of information will be a one-way street: UNMOVIC won't engage in supplying information to U.N. member governments. U.S. officials, in turn, have voiced concern in the past about turning over highly classified information to the United Nations, for fear it might not be adequately safeguarded.

Western officials acknowledge that reliable intelligence on Iraq is difficult to obtain. In the past, inspectors have at times found the information out of date or inaccurate, including some accounts provided by defectors. They say there is no substitute for conducting on-the-ground inspections and face-to-face interviews.

Former weapons inspector Raymond Zilinskas, who directs a nonproliferation program at the Monterrey Institute of International Studies, said, "We received many, many reports of underground [facilities]. I can't tell you how much time we spent searching. We drove hundreds of kilometers and never found anything."

'Sixth sense'

Added IAEA spokesman Mark Gwozdecky, "Obviously, technology is a tool, but they [inspectors] also use their eyes and ears. It's one thing to get a transcript. It's another thing to read body language. Their body of knowledge leads to a kind of sixth sense."

But the information supplied by the United States and its allies will be crucial Dec. 8, when Iraq is required to make a complete declaration of all its weapons of mass destruction programs. The Iraqi declaration will be compared with what UNMOVIC and IAEA have previously learned from various sources.

Omissions and false information would be a "material breach" of U.N. resolutions and are supposed to be reported to the Security Council, which would decide how to respond. The United States, for its part,

has reserved the right to undertake military action against Iraq if a "material breach" is found.

Analysts expect Iraq to provide more information than it has in its incomplete disclosures in the past, but to fall short of coming clean. However, the United States and Britain, the most hawkish members of the Security Council, appear to be undecided on whether they would use a false Iraqi declaration as a trigger for military action or let inspections proceed.

Some hard-line Iraq-watchers outside government are pushing the Bush administration to highlight any omissions or falsehoods, if necessary declassifying U.S. intelligence to make a public rebuttal.

"This is a moment to put the crown jewels on the table," said Patrick Clawson of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

High-tech help

In addition to intelligence, the United States plans to offer the inspectors a high-flying U-2 spy plane capable of supplying high-resolution pictures. One was made available to the previous U.N. inspection agency.

The inspectors have some of their own sophisticated equipment, including global positioning systems, radiation detectors, a portable device that can detect gamma radiation and a machine that can tell whether a metal object is a potential nuclear component, the Associated Press reported.

Recommended on Baltimore Sun

Advertisement