The latest proposed smoking ban, passed by a committee Tuesday night, would ban both cigarettes and "e-cigarettes" inside of bars and bowling alleys. Private clubs would have the ability to make their own decision.
- Bio | E-mail | Recent columns
- Local bar owners, patrons file lawsuit against city for smoking ban ordinance
- Anti-smoking advocates celebrate in Indianapolis as bars go smoke-free
- Bars celebrate with smoking clientele hours before ordinance takes effect
- Council Vote on Smoking Ban
- Push for smoking ban before Super Bowl
- ICVA supports Smoke Free Indy
- Smoking ban hits road block
- Senate debates statewide smoking ban
- Video: Statewide smoking ban bill
- Laws and Legislation
- Civil Laws
See more topics »
"It just doesn't make sense to me. It lacks common sense. It is water vapor, there is no real smoke involved in it."
In fact, he said, the "e-cigarettes" are a popular tool people use to quit smoking.
"We have had customers tell us that it has helped them slow down and quit completely," said Biggs.
They are also being used to smoke in public places without disturbing others.
"It's water vapor so unless you have a problem with water vapor then you should be fine," said Biggs.
But apparently City-County Councilman John Barth, D-At-Large, does have a problem with it and wants the electronic cigarettes to be included in the city's latest smoking ban.
"Electronic cigarettes are a new technology and there's a lot of unknowns," said Barth.
In 2009, the Food and Drug Administration found the product to contain carcinogens and toxins that can be harmful to the user and Barth said he believes they should be treated like regular cigarettes.
"So I think we need to err on the side of caution and err on the side of public safety," said Barth.
But since the FDA finds that it may only be harmful to the user, Biggs argues it should be up to the smoker to decide.
"The only harm is the person taking it, ingesting the nicotine. But that's their own choice. That's their body they should choose what they put into it and what they shouldn't," said Biggs.
The matter will go before the full City-County Council April 16 for public discussion preceding a vote.