Richard Lapointe, convicted of murdering his wife's 88-year-old grandmother 18 years ago, had to have committed the brutal, messy crime in a window of as little as 20 minutes.
Lapointe's lawyer, in aggressive questioning of a former Manchester police detective, spent the morning Tuesday trying to undermine this essential element state's case against the mentally disabled man.
In the process, Paul Casteleiro appeared to damage the credibility of Michael Morrissey, the Manchester police officer who interogated both Lapointe and his wife in the aftermath of the murder of Bernice Martin. Morrissey was forced to admit he mispresented facts, withheld information and ignored basic interogation procedure in order to get a confession from Lapointe.
Casteleiro took sharp aim at the scenario that has Lapointe taking his dog for a 20-minute walk and killing Martin before returning home looking as if nothing had happened.
"You think someone could walk .. to Bermice Martin's house, murder her, stab her, blood all of the bedroom, rape her ... set her house on fire ....and it appears there would be no sign whatsover?" Casteleiro demanded of Morrissey.
"It's possible,'' Morrissey said. And later, he added, "my goal has always been through my entire career in law enforcement was to get to the truth."
Casteleiro, in a wide-ranging cross-examination of Morrissey that Judge John J. Nazzaro did little to reign in, repeatedly asserted that local police were out to squeeze a confession out of Lapointe -- no matter what the facts might suggest.
Rockville Court Drama: Could Richard Lapointe Have Raped and Murdered Bernice Martin In Just 20 Minutes?
We've upgraded our reader commenting system. Learn more about the new features.
The Baltimore Sun encourages civil dialogue related to our stories; you must register and log-in to our site in order to participate. We reserve the right to remove any user and to delete comments that violate our Terms of Service. By commenting, you agree to these terms. Please flag inappropriate comments.