I have read with interest The Sun's coverage of Ray Lewis, S.W.A.T.S. and the deer antler spray that company allegedly provided him ("S.W.A.T.S. co-founder sticks to story," Jan. 31). As far as I have been able to ascertain from these articles, the story line goes something like this:
Mr. Lewis denies using a spray which Mitch Ross (as well as two other sources) say did not contain IGF-1 and which experts say could not be used to absorb IGF-1 anyway.
Forgive me, but I am unable to find any place in this narrative wherein any dog has been bitten by any man. Can you please explain to me why the media continue with this line?
I realize that there is precious...