In a letter posted on its website and published as an advertisement in the Daily Press, Riverside said of the anesthesiology group: "There were management shortcomings so severe that they undermined the service we delivered. That situation was intolerable and unsolvable under the previous contract, thus the decision to make a change."
But if relations were deteriorating for years, it was news to Rein.
"They weren't deteriorating for years," Rein said. "They are the ones who gave us a contract on February 18."
Rein said he met with Parcells that day and received a new contract to replace the one expiring in April. He and other Virginia Anesthesia representatives made arrangements with Parcells to sign the contract on March 18.
Instead, Parcells informed the group they that had been replaced, less than three weeks before their contract was due to expire.
Riverside officials acknowledged that the Feb. 18 incident factored into their decision to end their relationship with Virginia Anesthesia, but they refused to say what happened.
"It's been an ongoing frustration over the years," said Jerry Allen, hospital board chairman. "I'd have to say the incident probably brought it to a head. I really can't elaborate."
According to Rein, the case at issue involved postponing an unscheduled surgery because it was getting late, and the operating staff was down to one team. After 11 p.m., the team tries to be available for trauma cases. That night, the emergency department was treating a gunshot wound victim. The anesthesiologist decided to postpone the unscheduled surgery in case the gunshot victim needed emergency surgery, Rein said.
"Had we done that case, we would've waited for a call team to come in. Rather than do that, this is the path that was chosen," Rein said. "We didn't put a patient in harm's way. A patient got inconvenienced. But an inconvenience to a patient is not a reason to throw an entire group out."
During the course of negotiations, Parcells asked Rein to relinquish his post as chief of anesthesiology.
Rein complied but, Parcells said, "he was still a major player in running the anesthesia department here."
"Management issues and contractual negotiations had an influence on patient care," Parcells said.
When asked whether there was a threat to withhold services, Parcells did not answer yes or no.
"Patient care issues, in my opinion, were used as a wedge for contractual interactions," he said.
Rein said his group never made a threat about patient care.
"There was never a situation that we put any patient into harm," he said. "We never make a judgment on patient care based on what's in the contract. The contract has nothing to do with that."
Parcells discussed the problems with Virginia Anesthesia at the hospital's board of directors meeting in February.