I’d heard about such a proposal long before Williams announced his retirement in May. It had the support of Maryland president Wallace D. Loh and athletic director Kevin Anderson.
It turns out there was an interesting development during the Board of Regents’ discussion of the court-naming in executive session (meaning private) in September.
As my story in the paper says, board members were informed that the Williams court-naming decision could be tied to a significant potential donation to the university. The potential donor’s identity has not been disclosed.
It’s important to note that the decision to name the court for the coach was not made by the regents, but by Chancellor William "Brit" Kirwan.
Kirwan told me in a written statement that “a possible gift was not a factor in my consideration.”
And why did I report it?
For the same reason that reporters write about campaign contributions to political candidates. Because it’s important to learn about the environment in which important business is discussed.