They should accept it

K.C. Johnson

Chicago Tribune

Should the players accept the offer? Yes. Not because it's fair; because it's mostly not. The players have made virtually all the concessions. They should take the offer because the owners aren't bluffing. They will present a far harsher proposal if this one is rejected that likely would lead to the loss of the entire 2011-12 season.

Will the players accept the offer? I have no idea. This whole mess has been brought on not only by the economic model being broken but the disparate factions in each group. I guarantee there are multiple players out there that would have taken this current proposal weeks ago. They just want to play. But the specter of decertification looms large. And there's plenty of time between now and Monday for agents to muck it up.

kcjohnson@tribune.com

It will only get worse

Broderick Turner

Los Angeles Times

The current deal the NBA owners have offered is nowhere as good as the one that expired June 30, when the players got 57 percent of the basketball-related income.

As one can see during these negotiations, the proposals being offered have gotten incrementally worse for the players, and it won't get any better. The players should cut their losses and take this deal.

No, it's not a good deal for them. But the NBA owners are steadfast in making sure they come out on top this time.

I'd bet if the players put it to a vote, the vast majority would vote in favor of the deal.

They still will be millionaires and still get to play a game they all have maintained that they love.

bturner@tribune.com

They don't have a choice

Ira Winderman

Sun Sentinel

At this point, do they have any other choice, beyond losing a season and salary they never will be able to recoup?

The reality is the two prime holdups are mid-level and sign-and-trade concerns. But even with the most liberal guesstimates, that might affect, at most, 50 players each season (including those using the processes for leverage).