DURHAM, N.C.—Duke men's lacrosse coach John Danowski sat at a desk recently inside a Cameron Indoor Stadium office flipping through the student newspaper.
He pointed to one article, then another about the sexual assault case involving three former players. Then he shrugged. "It's all the time," he said quietly. "You open the school paper and two of the columns are lacrosse-related. Every day there are reminders of an event last spring."
The case is reminiscent of a political scandal in which the alleged crime becomes almost secondary to the mini-dramas sprouting around it. Like vines, those dramas extend in a dozen directions, entangling administrators, players, coaches, faculty and alumni.
"As far as I can see," Danowski said, "religion is about the only topic that hasn't been covered in this case."
It all seems to be happening at once: a collapsing criminal case, a district attorney's struggles, an impassioned campus debate, another investigation led by special prosecutors and, finally, a new lacrosse season that players hope will bring respite from the issues surrounding them.
When Danowski's team opens its season here against Dartmouth today, it will be the first game since the program was suspended by Duke's administration eight games into last year's schedule. Each player plans to wear the number of one of his indicted former teammates on his "shooter shirt" during pre-game warm-ups, according to co-captain Ed Douglas of Baltimore. Most, if not all, also intend to sport light-blue wristbands that say "innocent!" The team's first road game is at Maryland on Friday night.
It may be a new season, but too many issues linger for it to feel much like a fresh start.
Among the sagas is one involving Duke president Richard Brodhead, who some alumni - including former lacrosse captain Scott Diggs, a Loyola High graduate - believe mishandled the case and should step down. Brodhead has said he properly balanced the need to take the charges seriously with the presumption of the players' innocence.
But Diggs and others say the president didn't support the athletes and should have recognized early on that the accusations leveled by the North Carolina Central University student and exotic dancer were flawed.
"If I were a board member in dictating the direction of the university, I would easily lobby and garner support for his [Brodhead's] removal," Diggs said in a letter to Duke last year.
'Group of 88'Then there is the furor surrounding faculty members known as the "Group of 88," who endorsed a newspaper advertisement challenging the university to confront racism and sexism as the lacrosse matter unfolded last April.
Criticized by the lacrosse community and others for seeming to "rush to judgment" against the players, many of the professors sought to clarify their position last month. In an open letter to the university, they said they never "prejudged" the defendants and that their sentiments were intended generally as "a call to action on important, long-standing issues on and around our campus."
Douglas, the Duke co-captain who attended Gilman, said he hopes such campus fractures can be healed. "I think there is common ground," he said.
When the season begins, Douglas said, the players must avoid getting caught up in matters they can't control. He said he knows how special it would be to win a national championship at M&T Bank Stadium - Duke lost the title game to Johns Hopkins in its last full season - and divert the public's attention from last year's events.
"But I think we need to be careful not to try to play beyond ourselves and try to prove anything other than that we're a hard-working team," Douglas said. "I think if we try to incorporate aspects of the legal case or public opinion, then we're going to have some problems."
Danowski said he told the players at the beginning of practice last month: "You don't owe anybody anything. You play lacrosse because you love to play, because you love each other, you love the university and that's it."
The court case