Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. $12 for 12 weeks.
Sports College Sports College Football

Did Ohio State get too light a penalty?

A painful lesson

Matt Murschel

Orlando Sentinel

From the start, the Buckeyes tried to sweep all of this under the rug. The NCAA pulled that rug out from under the program Tuesday when it handed down a one-year postseason ban.

The penalty is harsh — no Big Ten or national championship in 2012 — but it could have been a whole lot worse. Just ask USC fans who had to suffer through back-to-back seasons without postseason play.

While Ohio State is no USC, it did drop the ball when it came to compliance.

With schools such as Miami and North Carolina still under investigation, the NCAA wanted to make an example. It's a painful lesson for the Buckeyes.

mmurschel@tribune.com

Yes, compared with USC

Gary Klein

Los Angeles Times

Ohio State probably got an appropriate penalty for the violations that occurred under Jim Tressel's watch. The problem is that, compared with USC, the Buckeyes got off easy.

USC's football program was hit with a two-year bowl ban and lost an unprecedented 30 scholarships, largely for the actions of one player. Ohio State gets a one-year bowl ban and loses nine scholarships for the actions of multiple players, boosters and Tressel, who covered up violations.

USC's mishandling of its case provided a template of what not to do. Ohio State and others have learned that admitting to some violations, self-sanctioning and cooperating with the NCAA helps ease the pain.

gklein@tribune.com

Pays to cooperate

Paul Doyle

Hartford Courant

Ohio State's punishment is proof that it pays to cooperate when the NCAA starts sniffing around your program.

By all accounts, USC wasn't so helpful when the NCAA investigated its program. That might have added to the mammoth penalty levied against the Trojans — 30 scholarships lost and a two-year bowl ban.

Ohio State apparently was contrite and cooperative, so the program wound up with a one-year bowl ban, three years of probation and the loss of nine scholarships.

The penalty is about right. Give Ohio State credit for handling the investigation well and cleaning up its mess. It's a lesson for the next school that falls under the NCAA's spotlight.

pdoyle@tribune.com

Should have been harsher

Teddy Greenstein

Chicago Tribune

The bowl ban is appropriate and will cast an embarrassing light on Ohio State for the next 12 months. Jim Tressel's show-cause penalty is valid. The five years the Buckeyes have to disassociate with Terrelle Pryor? They should have asked for 10.

But where the NCAA failed is by revoking only nine scholarships — from 85 to 82 for the next three seasons. Why bother with a number so small? So a few walk-ons won't get rewarded?

This penalty does nothing to deter coaches from cheating and will not affect the Buckeyes after next season. The NCAA should have yanked at least twice as many scholarships and cut Ohio State's contact period on the recruiting calendar in half.

tgreenstein@tribune.com

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Comments
Loading