In Case You Missed It: Baltimore Running Festival photos
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Who should set the rules for lacrosse?

Regarding your article about headgear worn by women lacrosse players, why is the government meddling in a topic it knows so little about? ("Headgear bill criticized," Feb. 14.)

Del. Jon S. Cardin was quoted as saying his bill aims to get a conversation started. What conversation? Concussions?

U.S. Lacrosse and its constituents have consistently informed players, coaches, referees and administrators of every aspect of how to recognize and deal with concussions. Helmets are not the answer to preventing concussions in lacrosse, or in any other sport for that matter.

In fact, there are more concussions in soccer than in women's lacrosse. Should the state mandate helmets for soccer players as well?

One question the government should be considering is whether rougher games will ensue if helmets are mandated, thus forcing girls to wear even more protective gear. Is this what officials want?

Why not let the government tend to governing and the governing body of lacrosse regulate the sport? That would be in the best interest of everyone involved.

Ruthie Lavelle

The writer is president of the Maryland Youth Lacrosse Association.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • The state legislature should not regulate women's lacrosse
      The state legislature should not regulate women's lacrosse

      State Dels. Jon Cardin and Dana Stein recently introduced legislation that would mandate helmets for female lacrosse players in Maryland (House Bill 1123). The bill was supposedly introduced "mostly to get the conversation started," in the words of Mr. Cardin's spokesperson, as...

    • Ulman-Rutherford (or vice versa) the best ticket
      Ulman-Rutherford (or vice versa) the best ticket

      Count me among the people who are dispirited by the governor's race. Thus, The Sun's suggestion that a ticket featuring the candidates for lieutenant governor, Democrat Ken Ulman and Republican Boyd Rutherford (or vice-versa), would present a far better ticket than pairing Mr. Ulman...

    • Brown ads are appalling
      Brown ads are appalling

      The latest attack ads from Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown's campaign and the Democratic Party hit a new low in sleaze, lies and hypocrisy ("Heading into final weeks, Brown shifts tone," Oct. 15). With oozing self-righteousness, they show youngsters and speak of how their opponent is...

    • A frackless future for Maryland
      A frackless future for Maryland

      Jim Guy's "No fracking in Western Md." (Oct. 10) and Robert Lawrence's "Time to ban fracking, O'Malley" (Oct. 10) make an indisputable case for keeping fracking out of Maryland.

    • Thanks to the O's
      Thanks to the O's

      What a great editorial ("Somewhere the sun is shining," Oct. 16). It almost helps. But, alas, it also reminds me of how much we lost when we lost Bart Giamatti.

    • Farm bill is bad for Baltimore Co.
      Farm bill is bad for Baltimore Co.

      Your recent article on the Baltimore County agricultural tourism bill unfairly describes battle lines being drawn between farmers on one side and local land preservationists on the other ("County bill sparks debate over tourism on farms," Oct. 14). This is an inaccurate...

    • In the global village, Ebola is a threat to us all
      In the global village, Ebola is a threat to us all

      Now that it has left Africa, the developed world is finally paying attention to Ebola ("Ebola fears continue to mount, spill into port business, politics," Oct. 16).

    • Keep the Conowingo
      Keep the Conowingo

      The Conowingo dam has done a wonderful job of supplying our power cleanly for the last eight decades ("Support the dam to support Md.," Oct. 13).

    Comments
    Loading