Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Attack on wind power a lot of hot air

Charles Campbell, a retired executive with Gulf Oil, once again gets the facts wrong in his latest attempt to attack wind energy ("Nuclear power is good for the environment," May 28).

First, Mr. Campbell falsely claims that Denmark has not seen a reduction in pollution as it has ramped up its use of wind energy. That could not be further from the truth. Denmark's electric sector carbon dioxide emissions are down 21 percent over the last decade, from 16.5 million tons in 1999 to 13 million tons in 2009, even though electricity use increased. Denmark's use of wind energy more than doubled over that time period, with wind energy currently providing more than 25 percent of the country's electricity. Other European countries, as well as leading wind energy states in the U.S., have seen similarly drastic reductions in emissions.

To support his claim Mr. Campbell cites a debunked fossil fuel industry attack on wind and actually misreports the findings of that report. Even this report, paid for by a fossil fuel lobbying group and conducted by a fossil fuel company, found that wind energy drastically reduces pollution. All utility and grid operator data and peer-reviewed studies on the subject confirm that finding, concluding that wind energy has no negative impact on the efficiency of fossil-fired power plants. In fact, wind energy's pollution reductions are often larger than expected because wind energy displaces the most expensive, and therefore least efficient, fossil-fired power plants first. The reality is that wind energy is easier and cheaper for grid operators to accommodate than large fossil and nuclear power plants, as wind energy output changes gradually and predictably while conventional power plants break down frequently and abruptly.

Finally, Mr. Campbell incorrectly blames European countries' high electricity prices on wind, when in reality their electricity prices were already high before wind energy was added, due to aggressive taxes on energy use. Data from the United States confirms that wind energy lowers electricity prices for consumers by displacing the use of expensive fossil fuels. Last month, Synapse Energy Economics released a report that found consumers in the Mid-Atlantic and Great Lakes states, including Maryland, would see $6.9 billion in net savings on their electric bills every year if the region doubled its use of wind energy beyond existing standards. Similar studies have found the same result in other regions.

As much as he would like to, Mr. Campbell cannot hide from the fact that wind energy is a win-win for consumers and the environment.

Michael Goggin, Washington, D.C.

The writer is manager of transmission policy for the American Wind Energy Association.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Wind farm addresses climate change threat
    Wind farm addresses climate change threat

    In the past two or three weeks, The Sun has printed at least three letters dealing with the Somerset County wind farm ("Wind project raises serious safety, health concerns," Dec. 6). They differed so much in content that it was almost impossible to see any commonality, except that none...

  • Wind project raises serious safety, health concerns
    Wind project raises serious safety, health concerns

    Andy Bowman's recent commentary regarding his company's wind power project in Somerset County does not represent the view from the eastern side of the Chesapeake Bay ("Politics, not safety concerns, hamper Eastern Shore wind project," Dec. 1).

  • Wind farm would harm Navy testing
    Wind farm would harm Navy testing

    As a former deputy assistant secretary of defense and past director of the Test Resource Management Center, it is clear to me that the decision to defer a final decision on the Great Bay Wind Energy Project was not a result of the political machinations of Rep. Steny Hoyer or any other...

  • Mikulski got it right on Somerset wind turbines [Letter]
    Mikulski got it right on Somerset wind turbines [Letter]

    Congratulations to Sen. Barbara Mikulski on her stance regarding the Patuxent River Air Station and the prolonged initiative to place wind turbines in Somerset County ("Eastern Shore wind farm: Let the Navy decide," Aug. 18).

  • Nuclear power doesn't add up [Letter]
    Nuclear power doesn't add up [Letter]

    I read with interest the commentary, "The nuclear option" (Aug. 26), in The Baltimore Sun, and I wanted to comment on just one aspect of this public pitch for nuclear power. The author omitted the fact that Constellation Energy made application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to...

  • Eastern Shore wind farm: Let the Navy decide [Editorial]
    Eastern Shore wind farm: Let the Navy decide [Editorial]

    Our view: Senator Mikulski should stop trying to save Pax River from itself

  • Put wind farm on hold [Letter]
    Put wind farm on hold [Letter]

    One can always hear a great "spin" in a story, particularly when the authors are activists for a cause. I refer to the commentary concerning wind turbines in Somerset County ("A wind-win situation," April 21). Authors Tom Vinson and Bruce Burcat are paid individuals whose job is to promote wind...

  • Criticism of Somerset wind farm proposal is off base [Letter]
    Criticism of Somerset wind farm proposal is off base [Letter]

    As the developers of the proposed Somerset County wind farm, we feel compelled to respond to the blatant — and seemingly intentional — factual misstatements put forth in recent letters to the editor by opponents of our investment.

Comments
Loading