Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Employers hurt by unemployment payments

Jeremy Schwarz's op-ed piece contrasting unemployment insurance and welfare makes several points that don't bear up under scrutiny ("Unemployment benefits are not like welfare," Dec. 21). He's correct that people pay insurance to protect themselves in case of an adverse event; however, workers do not pay for unemployment insurance. Unlike Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid, to which both employers and employees contribute, unemployment insurance is paid entirely by the employer.

Extensions of unemployment insurance unfairly change the rules of the game for employers. Employers pay a certain rate based on their history of terminating workers. A business that has never laid off or fired a worker in Maryland has seen its rates nearly quadruple in the last three years. Why? To pay for other employers' terminated workers and to pay for extensions to unemployment insurance.

When the government sets unemployment insurance rates based on paying unemployment for six months and then extends those benefits for months or years longer, it charges each employer more. This is like a life insurance company selling a 10-year term life policy and then increasing the term to 20 years, raising the premiums accordingly. The difference is that a consumer can choose to buy his life insurance elsewhere; the employer has no choice but to play by the new rules.

Renee Hamidi, Sparks

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Some unemployed people may be lazy, but most aren't

    I find it disconcerting and quite troubling as I read opinions being sent in to this paper stating that people collecting unemployment are just lazy and aren't looking for work because they're getting money for nothing and have no incentive ("Benefits in hand, unemployed are content not to work,"...

  • The myth of the 'lazy' unemployed

    Ah, another person writes in with the true skinny on why people in "the real world" will never get off unemployment ("Payroll taxes and unemployment benefits: two bad decisions," Dec. 28).

  • If you think paying unemployment insurance here is bad, try Paraguay

    Imagine my surprise this morning when I saw letters from apparently well-fed individuals complaining about paying unemployment insurance. For all those beleaguered employers who don't want to pay unemployment benefits I've got a solution: Hire illegal immigrants.

  • Jobless benefits aren't welfare

    Jobless benefits aren't welfare

    Unemployment insurance is like health insurance: You don't take it away just when people need it the most

  • Benefits in hand, unemployed are content not to work

    I am writing in response to Jeremy Schwartz's op-ed defense of extending unemployment benefits ("Unemployment benefits are not like welfare," Dec. 21). He babbles on about the virtues of continuing the give unemployment benefits and tries to decry those who see these benefits as another form of...

  • The GOP tax hike

    The GOP tax hike

    Our view: By rejecting the Senate's payroll tax cut extension, House Republicans put the U.S. economy at risk and reveal themselves to be certifiable

  • E-cigs ought to be regulated

    E-cigs ought to be regulated

    I want to applaud The Baltimore Sun for its recent editorial related to e-cigarettes ("Teens and e-cigarettes," Aug. 22). Allowing the use of e-cigarettes in public places undermines the effectiveness of our state's smoke-free law by exposing non-users to nicotine and other unknown and potentially...

  • Money alone won't solve Md.'s heroin problem

    Money alone won't solve Md.'s heroin problem

    In a recent editorial The Sun chose to ignore the many positives of Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford's interim heroin task force report and instead spent most of its energy misinterpreting and then harping on his seven-word remark about funding: "It's probably never going to be enough" ("Rutherford pleads...

Comments
Loading
69°