Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Contractor should be liable for damages from water meter installation

It has long been recognized that Baltimore City has a problem with the accurate determination of its residents' water bills. It is not the purpose of this letter to yet again tell the story of another Baltimore City resident who got an erroneous water bill, although I did receive one several months ago for $45,000. Clearly, a key component of this problem deals with the antiquated water meters that are presently currently in use within the city. I applaud the City Council's decision to replace these meters with state-of-the-art units that will ensure accurate bills ("City selects low bidder to install 400,000 water meters," Nov. 6). It's about time!

What I am bothered by is the proposal by the city to require home and property owners to purchase insurance to pay for any damage done by the installation of these meters by the contractor hired by the city. It has always been accepted that any damage to a water line on the homeowner's side of the water meter is the responsibility of the homeowner to repair. What I find hard to understand is why any damage done to the waterline on the homeowners side during it's installation by the contractor is not the contractor's responsibility to repair. If they break it, shouldn't they have to fix it? Why should I be required to take out insurance to pay for damages caused by the contractor during installation?

This is unfair and ridiculous and in essence is implementing yet another city tax for water meter installation. The city should get something right for a change and replace faulty water meters with no burden to the property owner.

Michael Dvorkin, Baltimore

To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Pricey city water
    Pricey city water

    Like all city property owners, I received a water bill last week that includes the 15 percent rate increase which went into effect on July 4 (Independence Day, perfect). The water charges (excluding sewer) are now $3.677 per 100 cubic feet. I also own a property in Baltimore County less than one...

  • Water meter boondoggle
    Water meter boondoggle

    Baltimore wants to replace our water meters with smart meters at a cost of $83.5 million ("City awards $83.5 million deal for water meters," Nov 7). I have lived in Baltimore County for 66 years and never had a faulty bill. Most of the reasons for this upgrade are cases of human error.

  • City should delay smart meter vote
    City should delay smart meter vote

    Our view: Questions about technology, bid instructions must be resolved

  • Go slow on meter contract
    Go slow on meter contract

    The tentative award to the low bidder for the upgrade of the area's water meters may not prove to be for the best ("Water meter bid is backed," Nov. 5).

  • City selects low bidder to install 400,000 water meters
    City selects low bidder to install 400,000 water meters

    Mayor says $83.5 million contract will help end 'outrageous' billing errors

  • Right-sizing county water departments
    Right-sizing county water departments

    I read with delight reporter Luke Broadwater's article outlining plans for "smart" water meters for Baltimore customers ("City agency recommends Itron for big water meter contract," Nov. 4).