Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. $12 for 12 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Challenge water rates and 'rain tax'

I want to both honor and condemn The Sun for its coverage of an issue that the average city citizen feels both perplexed and confused about. It's difficult for people to understand how they can be taxed with a Stormwater Utility Fee buried among 20 ballot questions in last year's election and then turn around and be hit with a proposed "rain tax" and a subsequent 15 percent increase proposed by the city's Department of Public Works ("Baltimore water bills could rise," May 20).

The detailed information provided by this publication was more than any elected official has done in educating the city's constituency on this issue, which is the sad reality of Baltimore politics. However, for the author of this article to not even mention a proposed lawsuit against the city for this very issue, by former city solicitor Neal Janey and Baltimore Circuit Court Clerk Frank Conaway Sr., when it was this publication that first educated the readers on the suit in October 2012, is a travesty in and of itself.

The people of Baltimore deserve to know when certain local leaders are willing to stand up for their rights against the oppressive system of big government, filled with bloated bureaucracy and numerous tax increases. We need to begin to hold these officials accountable by calling out their dirty tricks when they occur, like how the Maryland Zoo in Baltimore owed tens of thousands of dollars in an overdue water bill, yet were subsidized by the taxpayers money through another one of last year's ballot questions — Question G (a $200,000 bond bill).

Hassan Giordano, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • 'Rain tax' not optional
    'Rain tax' not optional

    The recent sub-headline on the editorial regarding the "rain tax" was patently false ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 23).

  • Rain tax exemption not worth the effort
    Rain tax exemption not worth the effort

    When we built our house in Anne Arundel County in 2002, we had to install a $10,000 wastewater management system because we were building within 1,000 feet of a body of water. We found this to be unreasonable but we had no appeal. We were certain that we qualified for an exemption now from...

  • Faulty 'rain tax' math
    Faulty 'rain tax' math

    The facts in your recent editorial about the so-called "rain tax" are very selective ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 21).

  • Sun ignores real cost of 'rain tax'
    Sun ignores real cost of 'rain tax'

    As usual, The Sun gets it wrong on the real cost to homeowners of the "rain tax" ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 24). According to the Sun's editorial board, the tax only costs about $39 a year for the typical Baltimore County homeowner. No big deal, right? Well, how about the residual...

  • The bogus 'rain tax' repeal
    The bogus 'rain tax' repeal

    Despite facing a bigger-than-expected budget shortfall, and although he promised a policy blackout until he takes office, Governor-elect Larry Hogan last week publicly reiterated his support for repealing Maryland's "rain tax" while meeting with fellow Republican governors in Florida. He told...

  • On 'rain tax,' Hogan has the right idea
    On 'rain tax,' Hogan has the right idea

    The Sun really doesn't get it! Larry Hogan is "repealing" the "rain tax" because it is emblematic of the over-taxing of our state's residents ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 24). You can engage in all the legalistic finger-wagging you care to, but the people of this state are not impressed...

  • In rush to cut taxes and fees, lawmakers are sacrificing long-term environmental sustainability
    In rush to cut taxes and fees, lawmakers are sacrificing long-term environmental sustainability

    I was disheartened to read that both Republican and Democratic legislators are already making plans to repeal the stormwater management fees designed to pay for projects that mitigate the only source of Chesapeake Bay pollution that is still on the rise ("After Hogan victory, local...

  • Time to flush the 'rain tax'
    Time to flush the 'rain tax'

    The Baltimore Sun editorial ("Bogus rain tax repeal," Nov. 24) neglects to mention that in passing the House Bill 987 Stormwater Management-Watershed and Restoration Program, the "rain tax" in response to the 2010 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency mandate aimed at reducing the pollution...

Comments
Loading